Posted on 06/08/2014 4:00:42 AM PDT by marktwain
The irony was these manufacturers that are producing .22LR variants of higher caliber guns were made specifically for the purpose of being able to use the guns you are familiar with, but with the affordability of a lower caliber .22LR round. Well, we all know the availability of .22LR is nil and affordability is relative but not what it once was. Hell, I have a S&W M&P 22 that I have never used based on the scarcity of .22LR and the only reason I bought it was the perceived bang for buck over using 9mm at the range.
That will make a good tagline for someone on FR.
“7.65 Argentine”
I have an 1891 chambered in that. Passed down from my Grandfather to Father to me. Son git his first deer with it and it will go to him. Started reloading over 20 years ago just to feed that rifle. Now I reload for everything I shoot, except 22 rimfire.
Best decision I ever made. Paid $75 for a Bonanza Coax press will full reloading kit and dies at a gun shop way back then. I think the press alone is over $300 now.
If I were to say a correction is taking place, it is on the price and availability of firearms themselves.
If Wal-Mart did engage in some (as you call it) "gouging," the end result would be more .22 ammo for more people at reasonable, if higher, prices.
Who buys out the ammo in that 30 minutes to one hour? Some shooters, sure, but many others who then resell it for several times the price. So basically, Wal-Mart is a distributor to high mark-up resellers, who can coordinate their purchases.
Wal-Mart would be doing its customers a favor by charging something closer to market, making it available to serious shooters at a high price rather than unavailable at any price.
But I get the public relations problem inherent with that. If I were advising them (which of course I'm not), I'd say up the price then advertise that the proceeds over and above the regular price would be donated to a gun rights cause.
Eh, no one ever listens. :-)
Only thing better than the sound is the smell. Because that means you are part of the happenings.
Yeah! Nothing beats that smell of gunpowder.
I still wonder how the crowd shows up right when they stock the shelves? I’ve been in several times and get different answers as to when they get their shipments. Then again I am not going into WalMart everyday. I’d be happy with one 525 brick to be honest.
The cheapest 22 LR ammo available now on Midway is 14 cents a round. The cheapest .357 ammo available now is running around 75-80 cents a round. I’ve done very little shooting in the last 2 years because I did not stock up in advance and don’t want to pay that much for ammo.
I wish I owned a .45, which still has ammo at a reasonable price. I might buy one so I can shoot something without throwing dollars bills out with every shot!
My girl and I started teaching concealed pistol courses around the time the prices started to skyrocket. It was up to us to obtain 50 rounds per student for their range exercises. The range we usually used stopped selling any ammo at all except with the purchase of a firearm.
So my girl’s job was to call store after store and ask when their shipments were expected, and then to be there to purchase the maximum allowable quantities of 9mm and .38 rounds. It was time-consuming but we were able to keep ammunition in stock for shooters.
We got a break when we found Firearm Exchange shooting range in Livonia, Michigan (yes, I’ll give them a plug, but not my old range). They sold their own re-loads, any quantity you wanted, for a reasonable price (I forgot exactly, but well within our budget). You had to agree to use it all on the range that day, and not take any out (though they took your word for it) and they were quality reloads - no misfires.
But that’s how it’s done. Calling ahead to each store and then camping out there until the shipment arrives.
Our local Cabels’s (not really local, more like 40 miles away) were good about letting us know when to expect shipments. But you had to be in line early, because lots of others knew too.
I bought a can of 420 rds xM855 (SS109) from WM a year ago. Cost $175. CTD had the same thing - For $399 - What else but “gouging” woul you call it?
As for who buys the 22s, a one to 3 box limit isn’t a great inducement to waste an hour or so every morning for a Reseller. Unless they just have nothing better to do.
Not even. Look there is no way a three year old can handle most rifles or shotguns. Very few should be shooting anything other than cap guns or air soft until their coordination and brain power is better. I started shooting with my father when I was five. I took range lessons and competitive shooting since the age of seven.
When some one claims to know four people who have aver a hundred guns each I call BS....particularly since they said the owners weren’t collectors or sellers.
If you own over a hundred guns and rifles, why don’t you list a few dozen? I myself only own two shot guns, a 30.06, a couple of .22s from my childhood, and five or six hand guns (it depends on if you count the black powder pistol that is an antique heirloom that hasn’t been fired in hundreds of years)
This article does nothing to support your claim of knowing four people who each own over a hundred guns. My point was simple and direct.... MOST gun owners do not own a hundred guns. Even a family of four does not need five a piece. Age and experience determines what gun IF any one should own. Children who are young, uncoordinated, irresponsible, and untrained should not be using or owning a gun at all.
The article points out a decline in gun ownership not a growing number of those with hundreds of guns.
You and I are in agreement. My BS call was on how many have hundreds of guns because that was the other posters claim. I do not find 27 ( because I am guessing that is for a household but I will even give it an okay for an individual) as outlandish. I live in a similar type of area where I can hear the hunters during the season and most households have some fire arms.
It is the sound of freedom
It is not that it won’t fir at all. I never said that. It is a scientific fact that the charge loses its full effectiveness which means you may not get as much distance and power. This simply means you are better off and more effective with fresh ammo
The article points out a decline in gun ownership because of the fear of confiscation. Same with the guys who haul their guns around in their boats and end up having horrific accidents.
It does not support what the previous poster was claiming about owning hundreds of guns
Bookmark.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.