Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel
I agree with your summary of his entire talk.

MSM has given conservatives reason to doubt their reports. However, it still surprises me how many people are immediately ready to call an unpleasant report from the MSM a lie, or to accept an article that clearly tells only one side of a story, without doing even a tiny amount of research.

58 posted on 04/24/2014 11:17:59 AM PDT by Scoutmaster (I'd rather be at Philmont)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Scoutmaster

I said this on another site. I’ll post it here.

“Harry Reid is the problem if you’ve been paying attention. And not some plain spoken man because he said something absence of malice. A man that didn’t play by the contemporary PC rules set up by liberals, and he not knowing the world has left-shifted beneath him. You’re the one using deflection from the real issues.

Furthermore, you think the company size group of men are going to leave Bundy anytime soon because the liberal press plays dishonest, propaganda, gotcha-games so a large group of federally armed men can take him by force? I doubt it.

So what’s next?

Judge Napolitano gave an easy and reasonable solution: file an injunction in the local courts to put a lien on his property when Bundy sells the land or before inheritance. So why not do this Snip? Why is the Obama/Reid government so head long to use violence to take Bundy by force?

Now, a court injunction doesn’t work for Harry Reid does it because that could take decades. Old Harry maybe 6 feet under in the mean time, and where his hidden crooked deals gets nixed. No fun for the megalomaniac and power tripping hungry.

So is Reid and Obama going to send in an estimated battalion sized group against a company of motivated men protecting Bundy from an overreaching and immoral government? - Which would lead to disasters on so many levels.

I’ll give you some clues. You’ll immediately lose the propaganda battle against Bundy. How many more armed men would take up arms against the government because of an unjust and immoral government’s use of power. Just extrapolate the poll numbers that you see above on this thread. How many causalities would result from government violent action here? The Feds could take 15 to 20% causalities if the armed militia leadership protecting Bundy can walk and chew gum at the same time. Are the Feds who would carry out such orders crazy enough to risk it - risk their lives? For what? Reid and Obama’s craziness and for turtles? Totally nuts. “


64 posted on 04/24/2014 4:06:58 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson