Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: JRandomFreeper
we had a great deal of information about the 9/11 attackers. That didn't stop that attack

Because the Dems had erected a wall between intel agencies. If you can't share information , you're not going to stop an attack. The US Gov't wasn't allowed to dive into the laptop of the hijacker in FL to find incriminating info because there were privacy laws preventing it. That info would have stopped 9/11.

Americans are still dying.

Far, far fewer than if the terrorists had free reign to communicate with their sympathizers in the US. As I said, there has been no devastating attack since 9/11. That is largely due to potential terrorists believing they are being monitored.

41 posted on 01/19/2014 6:50:12 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: what's up

Boston was devastating. Even Benghazi is devastating, made the moreso because the actions of our state department and presidential administration make us wonder whose side they are even on.


44 posted on 01/19/2014 6:52:31 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: what's up
Bull crap. You can't prove that any attacks have been averted by the wholesale spying on Americans.

You can prove that Americans are having their rights abrogated by an over-reaching federal government.

I'll take my chances with the terrorists.

3000 dead isn't devastating. 6 million into ovens is.

/johnny

48 posted on 01/19/2014 6:54:58 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson