Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2013 GDP Growth Rate Closer to -1.75%
Natural Born Conservative ^ | September 21, 2013 | Larry Walker Jr

Posted on 09/21/2013 11:34:54 AM PDT by NaturalBornConservative

Phony Government Statistics: GDP

- By: Larry Walker, II -

“There are six things that the Lord hates, seven that are an abomination to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discord among brothers.” ~ Proverbs 6:16-19 ~

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is one of the broader measures of economic activity and is the most widely followed business indicator reported by the U.S. government. But according to Economist Walter J. Williams of Shadow Government Statistics, “Upward growth biases built into GDP modeling since the early 1980’s have rendered this important series nearly worthless as an indicator of economic activity... With reported growth moving up and away from economic reality, the primary significance of GDP reporting now is as a political propaganda tool and as a cheerleading prop for Pollyannaish analysts on Wall Street.”

On August 29, 2013, the Federal Government reported that Real Gross Domestic Product -- the output of goods and services produced by labor and property located in the United States -- increased at an annual rate of 2.5 percent in the second quarter of 2013 (that is, from the first quarter to the second quarter), according to the "second" estimate released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). In the first quarter, real GDP increased 1.1 percent. (The BEA will release its final number for the second quarter 2013 on September 26, 2013, at 8:30 A.M. EDT.)

However, this GDP headline number refers to the most-recent quarter’s annualized quarter-to-quarter rate of change (what that quarter’s percent quarter-to-quarter change would translate into if compounded for four consecutive quarters). This can mean that the latest quarter can be reported with a positive annualized growth rate, while the actual annual rate of change is negative, as was the case for the 3rd quarter of 2009. So is the economy really growing or not?

Note: The chart above, courtesy of ShadowStats.com, shows Annual Growth (Year-to-Year Percent Change). This is not the annualized quarterly rate of change that serves as the headline number for the series.

Shadow GDP

According to Shadow Government Statistics, the annual growth percentage change in GDP for the second quarter 2013, based on Official BEA data, was a mere 1.64%. However, when the aforementioned upward biases, inserted into GDP since 1984, are removed, the annual growth percentage change for the second quarter 2013 was actually more like -1.75%.

In fact, if you study the chart above, in conjunction with source data courtesy of Shadow Government Statistics, other than an anemic growth rate of less than 0.51% for the first, second, and third quarters of 2004, based on pre-1984 methodology, annual GDP growth has been negative ever since the second quarter of 2000.

Even worse, every time the BEA makes a new Pollyannaish change in its GDP reporting methodology, all prior data is restated back to the year 1929. For example, according to Shadow Government Statistics, methodological changes made in 2004 led to increases in previously reported GDP of 2.86% for 1980, and 5.25% for 1990 (see table below).

Unless this nonsense is reigned in, I suspect that in the near future, the Great Depression will be referred to as the Booming 30’s. Should you wish to study this topic further, please take a few moments to read the series authored by Walter J. "John" Williams, “Government Economic Reports: Things You’ve Suspected But Were Afraid To Ask!

The Bottom Line: Nearly every key statistic reported by the Federal Government is a lie. Virtually every word emanating from Washington, DC is a lie. Although the American people may be exceptional, the Government of the United States, as it stands today, has strayed so far from the mark that there will be none other to blame as it seals its own demise.

Related: Black Unemployment Rate Closer to 37.9%: Phony Government Statistics, Detroit and Black Americans


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; History; Politics
KEYWORDS: bea; economy; gdp; government
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 09/21/2013 11:34:54 AM PDT by NaturalBornConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Looks like Shadowstats is branching out.


2 posted on 09/21/2013 11:39:59 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Due to a lack of good-quality hard data, the "advance" GDP report is little more than a guesstimate.

If anyone knows about "a lack of good-quality hard data", it's John Williams.

3 posted on 09/21/2013 11:44:22 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Do you know if he makes money doing what he does? I mean, anyone can draw graph with a line on it, and draw another line underneath.


4 posted on 09/21/2013 11:46:04 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NaturalBornConservative
Nearly every key statistic reported by the Federal Government is a lie.

That's awful. Show us how you calculate your key statistics, John.

5 posted on 09/21/2013 11:46:19 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NaturalBornConservative
Nearly every key statistic reported by the Federal Government is a lie. Virtually every word emanating from Washington, DC is a lie.

Hear, hear!

6 posted on 09/21/2013 11:46:44 AM PDT by DakotaGator (Weep for the lost Republic! And keep your powder dry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
He sells subscriptions.

Someone noted that despite his claims of much higher than reported inflation, he hasn't raised his subscription rate in years and years.

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/25/another-alternative-inflation-measure/?_r=0

OMG! Spanked by Krugman. LOL!

7 posted on 09/21/2013 11:50:35 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
he hasn't raised his subscription rate in years and years

Is that true? Darn shame, if it's the case: one would imagine that his subscription rate would more closely match his stated inflation rate.

8 posted on 09/21/2013 11:55:35 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NaturalBornConservative

Only in the diseased, perverted “mind” of the libtard could a negative number be associated with “growth”.


9 posted on 09/21/2013 1:08:00 PM PDT by Common Sense 101 (Hey libs... If your theories fly in the face of reality, it's not reality that's wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Common Sense 101

Government is growing & that’s the only growth they care about.


10 posted on 09/21/2013 1:17:42 PM PDT by Twotone (Marte Et Clypeo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Show us how you calculate your key statistics, John.

Williams' methodology is set out at his website.

I don't see Paul Krugman disagreeing with Williams' conclusions.

11 posted on 09/21/2013 1:36:24 PM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kennard
Williams' methodology is set out at his website.

Don't keep us hanging, share the fun.

12 posted on 09/21/2013 1:46:15 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

I wonder if the real Walter Williams made him change his name?


13 posted on 09/21/2013 1:47:47 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DakotaGator

Lies? No there damn lies.


14 posted on 09/21/2013 2:06:17 PM PDT by Red Dog #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

“Williams’ methodology is set out at his website.”

‘Don’t keep us hanging, share the fun.’

http://www.shadowstats.com/article/gross_domestic_product


15 posted on 09/21/2013 2:34:17 PM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kennard
I didn't see what you claimed at that link.

Maybe you could cut and paste the methodology you saw?

16 posted on 09/21/2013 3:18:37 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NaturalBornConservative
Though the "annualizing" of quarterly GDP numbers is scandalous [even the Europeans don't go that far], I cannot see how this guy arrives at a negative GDP growth rate. It's bad enough that the quarterly rate is really just a shade over 1/4%.

That's statistical noise. A rounding error is more significant.

And, besides, GDP is a worthless indicator of economic growth. Capital growth alone leads to economic growth. Consumer spending and government spending are interesting figures to look at but they don't build new factories or hire new employees.

17 posted on 09/21/2013 3:42:54 PM PDT by BfloGuy (Workers and consumers are, of course, identical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Dog #1

Indeed!


18 posted on 09/21/2013 7:17:35 PM PDT by DakotaGator (Weep for the lost Republic! And keep your powder dry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

When you consider that GDP includes govt. deficit spending, real GDP is really negative 3 or 4%.


19 posted on 09/21/2013 7:21:04 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Oh come on! He uses the same methodology that the federal government used to use prior to 1984. It’s not rocket science, it’s that every few years the federal government changes formulas to make the public feel better. We’re actually in as bad a shape as the chart shows, and most people know that.


20 posted on 09/22/2013 2:43:08 AM PDT by NaturalBornConservative ("Something that everyone knows isn't worth knowing" ~ Bernard Baruch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson