“BG2. I don’t know how to be more clear about this. HRS 338-17 says that the probative value of late and altered BC’s has to be determined by the administrative or judicial official or body to whom the BC is presented as evidence.”
__
Really, you can be more clear. Much more clear.
HRS §338-16 clearly states that late and altered birth certificates shall ‘be marked distinctly “late” or “altered”.’
Since neither the COLB or the LFBC is so marked, why are you arguing as though they were?
Neither you nor I have seen a genuine COLB or a genuine long-form. Onaka has. And he refused to verify the truth of any birth fact claimed on the birth record they have in their office. The only lawful reason for him to refuse to verify the facts claimed on a birth record is if that record is not legally valid/prima facia evidence. The record being marked as LATE and/or ALTERED explains why Onaka would not verify any birth facts, and it explains why Obama’s handlers had to forge both the COLB and long-form even though HI has a record claiming the same facts as the forgeries claim. The problem is those LATE and/or ALTERED stamps that had to be gotten rid of. This also explains why Obama would never present his actual documents to any administrative or judicial official or body but would only present it to people who have been caught lying to cover for him.