It doesn't matter.
1) THAT IS THE MANUAL THAT APPLIED FOR BIRTHS IN 1961. IT SAYS SO QUITE DIRECTLY.
LET THAT SINK IN.
2) THEY DIDN'T HAVE WHAT THEY CLEARLY CLAIMED TO HAVE, AND MADE A HUGE DEAL OVER
WHAT THEY CLAIMED TO HAVE, WHEN IT TURNED UP, COMPLETELY AND ABSOLUTELY CONTRADICTED THEM.
THERE IS NO WAY THEY COULD HAVE CLAIMED TO HAVE THE 1961 VITAL STATISTICS INSTRUCTION MANUAL WITHOUT HAVING IT WITHOUT DOING SO DELIBERATELY.
THEREFORE, THEY ARE FRAUDS.
LET THAT SINK IN.
And ONE MORE TIME, that document does NOT jibe with the 1961 Natality Report. Let that sink in.
I have no idea what you're talking about there. If you think it "doesn't jibe" with the 1961 Natality Report, produce said report and let's take a look at it.
I can tell you this: Like everything else birthers have EVER said, I've no doubt your claim is going to turn out to be BULLSH*T.
But I'm willing to take a look at it anyway. If I'm wrong about that, I will certainly admit it.
In fact, I've been willing to admit I was wrong all along, if anyone could produce any real birther evidence. As I've said before, I've never seen ANYTHING but BS.
Only for births that occurred AFTER Obama was born, and that's if it's even authentic. It is still not consistent with the 1961 Natality Report.
...As I’ve said before, I’ve never seen ANYTHING but BS...
I suggest you remove your head from where all it sees is BS. Maybe with some sunshine you can then see the truth.