A gentle word of caution - much of this is so broad as to be essentially meaningless, and that is not an accident. Real data about this guy is going to need to be double-sourced at least. There is nobody in it at the moment who doesn’t have a highly sensitive vested interest in precisely what information is to be shared, least of all a company who just got burned talking about the guy who did it, or the agency who hired them to hire him that is now concerned with damage control.
Well yeah, of course. None of my buddies from the old days are calling me, so I have to go with what the MSM and blogosphere tell me.