It's actually laughable.
There is no original research, simply a "data analysis" of other studies which in and of themselves reputable. In short: the author is a vaccination conspiracy theorist who's had the rug pulled out from under her, so now she's cherry pricking dietary findings in order to come up with a new "epigenetic pathway" to facilitate her "mechanism." It's completely invalid statistically and experimentally, and I wonder what kind of "peer review" this "journal" uses to allow such an article to be published.
I actually feel some what sorry for these people. They obviously have a child that doesn’t meet their expectations or hopes or dreams (or whatever) and they are desperately seeking some one or some thing to blame. I guess they idea that we all supposedly learned in kindergarten...that you get what you get...hasn’t hit home for them.
Mores the shame because they do more damage than good