Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Tex-Con-Man

The evidence he has uncovered is false because he’s... he’s.... he’s a nut!?

I believe the evidence stands on it’s own merits. Frank Davis took naked pictures of Stanley Ann Dunham in December of 1960, shortly after she became pregnant.

Didn’t see a rebuttal to those facts anywhere in your excerpt. What’s a matter? Can’t do anything other than ad hominem the messenger? So he’s a nut, but the facts he has uncovered speak for themselves. Let’s talk about the actual evidence, shall we?


4 posted on 10/01/2012 2:46:02 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
Let’s talk about the actual evidence, shall we?

Forthcoming...it's a series.

6 posted on 10/01/2012 3:06:40 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man (T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp
Frank Davis took naked pictures of Stanley Ann Dunham in December of 1960, shortly after she became pregnant.

This is her in 1960:

1959.

1958

This is not her:

At least not her in 1960.

This is her in 1972:

Unless she had her jaw broken and reset twice, it ain't her.

9 posted on 10/01/2012 3:32:39 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp

Let’s talk about the actual evidence, shall we?

They don’t like to do that...ever. Wonder why?


15 posted on 10/01/2012 4:00:16 PM PDT by Josephat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson