Skip to comments.
Did The Romney Campaign Read Rules for Radicals?
Vanity
| 9/1/12
| Lee Roggenburg
Posted on 09/01/2012 4:56:08 AM PDT by LRoggy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
1
posted on
09/01/2012 4:56:20 AM PDT
by
LRoggy
To: LRoggy
Well Papa Romney was an Alinskyite and I see nothing admirable in the Recent GOP behavior.
When you become the enemy, exactly who has won?
2
posted on
09/01/2012 5:01:35 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: cripplecreek
You are absurd.
Communists use guns, in war.
Does that mean Capitalists should NOT use guns, in war?
LEARN HOW TO FIGHT!
You purists want to lose but lose as purists.
3
posted on
09/01/2012 5:04:58 AM PDT
by
Kansas58
To: LRoggy
Read it? Team willard seems to have memorized it along with the discourses by Machiavelli.
Nice for purposes of beating hussein. Not so nice when those same strategies are used against conservatives.
4
posted on
09/01/2012 5:06:02 AM PDT
by
RKBA Democrat
(WILLARD 2012 - It's not just a campaign, it's a conservative suicide pact!)
To: Kansas58
Yeah whatever. Guess I’m the enemy now.
Maybe you should have me silenced at FR.
5
posted on
09/01/2012 5:08:56 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: LRoggy
Idealism is admirable. However, I prefer to oust the clown-in-chief now and regroup later. We have to stand united against multiple threats to our country.
6
posted on
09/01/2012 5:16:22 AM PDT
by
Silentgypsy
(If you love your freedom, thank a vet.)
To: RKBA Democrat
“Nice for purposes of beating hussein. Not so nice when those same strategies are used against conservatives.”
Those same nasty strategies have been used against us by Dems for years now. Time to strike back. An eye for an eye, fight fire with fire etc. etc. They’ve gotten away with murder because conservatives are by nature well behaved and polite. That’s when we always get sucker punched, and they know we don’t fight back. Not now though, the party is over for the Dems. The Empire strikes back.
7
posted on
09/01/2012 5:36:21 AM PDT
by
flaglady47
(When the gov't fears the people, liberty; When the people fear the gov't, tyranny.)
To: cripplecreek
Is that who I think it is shaking hands with George Romney?!
8
posted on
09/01/2012 5:37:43 AM PDT
by
RKBA Democrat
(WILLARD 2012 - It's not just a campaign, it's a conservative suicide pact!)
To: Kansas58
Give them a taste of their own medicine!
9
posted on
09/01/2012 5:47:47 AM PDT
by
elephant
To: RKBA Democrat
Its Saul Alinsky meeting with George Romney to talk about how to "solve" the problems of Detroit.
This whole campaign seems to be about finishing the job started by Mitt's father.
10
posted on
09/01/2012 5:48:38 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: flaglady47
if you’ve read any of my posts over the years you’d know that I’m an advocate of firing back when fired upon.
The problem with embracing alinskys tactics is that they become the thing you use not just against the bad guys, they also end up being used against the good guys. Hell is filled with those who figured they’d embrace a little evil for the best of reasons. And then it became their master.
Think I’m being overly dramatic? Pick up a copy of rules for radicals and read who it is dedicated to.
11
posted on
09/01/2012 5:57:08 AM PDT
by
RKBA Democrat
(WILLARD 2012 - It's not just a campaign, it's a conservative suicide pact!)
To: LRoggy
Clint Eastwood's empty chair was a stroke of genius. Even a moron watching in TV land could figure out that the invisible empty suit is a giant POS!
To: cripplecreek; RKBA Democrat
Yeah, "Purist" alright~Don't forget the Convention fight in '64 when the Purist Jorge Romney refused to support the honest-to-G-D Conservative Barry Goldwater, which gave us Lyndon Johnson, who is one of the main people responsible for our current situation!
13
posted on
09/01/2012 6:07:43 AM PDT
by
KC_Lion
(Romney, why do you have to be on the ticket?!)
To: LRoggy
Reportedly the chair was Clint’s doing, without the campaign’s knowledge, and the stagehand who brought it out for him as Clint asked assumed he would sit in it.
14
posted on
09/01/2012 6:20:39 AM PDT
by
newzjunkey
(Election night is 65 days away.)
To: KC_Lion
As far as I’m concerned the GOP is responsible for Obamacare because of the conservatives they threw overboard in 08.
15
posted on
09/01/2012 6:21:19 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: KC_Lion
There’s an old piece on that fight posted just above. It’s hard to fault with fighting Goldwater for opposing civil rights legislation.
16
posted on
09/01/2012 6:26:28 AM PDT
by
newzjunkey
(Election night is 65 days away.)
To: cripplecreek
Hell I say they are for allowing the "Cloister" Vote or whatever the Hell it was called, the vote that even allowed DeathCare to be voting on in the first place. The Republicans voted for that.
Saul Alinksy got 2 of his protegees in both the Dem/Repub parties for the price of one.
Have you switched your party affiliation yet C.C.? I didn't want to be associated with the Progressive wing anymore.
17
posted on
09/01/2012 6:27:33 AM PDT
by
KC_Lion
(Romney, why do you have to be on the ticket?!)
To: newzjunkey; cripplecreek

The 1957 Civil Rights bill was halted in congress, with no small part due to Senate Majority Leader Lyndon Johnson.
While Senator Barry Goldwater pushed hard for it.
Not-So-Ironically their roles would be reversed in 1964 because Goldwater thought the Title II and Title VII of the bill unlawfully overextended the role of the federal government.
While Lyndon Johnson (sadly) correctly inferred this would make blacks depended on the Democrat Party.
18
posted on
09/01/2012 6:30:28 AM PDT
by
KC_Lion
(Romney, why do you have to be on the ticket?!)
To: KC_Lion
Not-So-Ironically their roles would be reversed in 1964 because Goldwater thought the Title II and Title VII of the bill unlawfully overextended the role of the federal government.
And look where we are today where businesses are forced to take customers they don't want and Chick-Fil-A is public enemy number 1 for an opinion.
19
posted on
09/01/2012 6:38:55 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: cripplecreek
"We reserve the right to refuse service"
That right is essential to an American, to NOT do something.
Now it is required by law to do EVERYTHING, Deathcare is a tax on being alive!
Does that sound like liberty to you?
20
posted on
09/01/2012 6:41:50 AM PDT
by
KC_Lion
(Romney, why do you have to be on the ticket?!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson