Posted on 08/08/2012 10:31:28 AM PDT by jmaroneps37
One visit from Hillary Clinton and it's all gone! Four different recorded events involving the name of Barack Obama taking place in the then British Protectorate of East Africa have surfaced in British National Archives.
Details of the years between 1953 to 1963 were logged into the Kew branch of Britains public records office according to a communique dated July 18, 2012, authored by Dan Crosby.
A record of birth of a second son (of Barack Obama, Sr.) is significant because biographical information about Obamas family indicates Obama, Sr., fathered only one other son prior to Obama IIs birth, says Crosby.
Now, the spelling of Burack and Biraq surfaced in hand written line records along with a listing of a marriage license registration dated 1954 and a 1961 birth.
The problem researchers now are struggling with in attempts to verify this data involves Series RG36 reference books, but researchers were denied access under Chapter 52, Sections 3 and 5 or the British Public Records Act of 1958.
Microfilm for the British birth registrations seems to be under the same lock down as microfilm Sheriff Joe Arpaio and lead investigator Mike Zullo have tried unsuccessfully to locate. Where is the microfilm? Sheriff Joe asked a recent East Orlando Tea Party seminar.
Hillary Clinton traveled to Great Britain in 2009 as part of her junket to Africa, and evidence shows these records were available for public access before this trip.
She is alleged to have made a sudden visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British agency which oversees Public Records Archives from colonial protectorates in early August of 2009.
For some unknown reason Obama, Sr. did NOT include the birth of a son on his INS application to remain in America
.
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
Not sure how we get started, maybe through the Tea Party treads, but we all need to volunteer as poll watchers. I plan to very soon go to my town officials and ask them to show me that these machines will count properly, I want to SEE it!
Here's my excuse, if you are in the mood for an excuse.
There suddenly is a suspicious amount of renewed activity on old stuff right now ... stuff that has been outed, vetted, hashed and rehashed for 3 years. Now the new wave of stuff is trotting it all out again ... but oddly enough with many all already-disproven inaccuracies, misstatements, and just plain wrong info.
I really suspect a campaign of misinformation and misdirection. Why now are Hannity, Beck, AND Rush jumping on the "College Records" bandwagon? This stuff has been out there since '06! Now they are quoting Root? A "Columbia Man" with lousy grammar and not-quite-right factoids? WTF? Over.
Perhaps they are setting an elaborate trap for Obama and his harping on Mitt's tax records ... which as POTUS he has instant access to anyway ... I don't know ... I no like.
I am getting twitchy and itchy. Somethin' Ain't right here.
ON please.
And we must prove it in November ................................................................ FRegards
Of course! Our votes are going be counted in Spain by a Soros company. What is not to trust? /s
The "math will be:
0b0z0's votes X 2
Romney's votes X 1/2
It’s okay, no wurries. I just got it and never saw it before and as you say there’s all kinds of stuff out there that surly needs vetting before posting. I was just curious if anyone else has seen it before and what is its provenance.
Have you ever heard Harvard man, obie, speak without a teleprompter?
That’s the reason these pollsters are skewing the polls to make it appear a close election so that when they count the votes (and dis-count the GOP votes) the masses cannot cry foul.
That bio. came from BHO’s literary agents:
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/17/Obama-pamphlet-in-use-2007
Now that you mention it sounds familiar.
I gotta tell you, the suspense is building.
WHAT are a couple of those inaccurate facts you’ve kept alluding to for the past day or so?
Because in 2003, Obama was already a well known State Senator in Illinois preparing to run for the U.S. Senate. Yet, according to Root, Obama wasn't even invited to the 20th reunion. He hadn't yet highlighted his 'graduation' from Columbia as a Senatorial or Presidential candidate.
SEE #32
Exactly, I have said that to my wife weeks ago...but exit polling will tell a different story, unfortunately that is too late.
Why, the First Birther did, of course!
BFD. Best Bet? Obama was not a "Transfer Student" to Columbia College. He was a walk-in General Studies student, who was slipped into the "graduation track," which in and of itself is or was not so unusual.
The deal is (or was) that if you completed enough at General Studies, had acceptable credits from another school, or for "life experience," one could get a Columbia degree for General Studies work. That degree; that diploma, oddly enough, was issued by Columbia College.
I am reasonably sure that Bill Ayers received Obama in NYC. Obama's gay-activist-Marxist Mentor at Occidental, Laurence Goldyn, was a close friend of Ayers. Ayers could have easily shepherded Obama through Columbia, using his strong family ties on the faculty.
That's news. I.E., Bill Ayers is not "a guy from the neighborhood." He and Obama were connected in NYC.
Furthermore, what is also really unusual is that Obama actually spent very little time at Columbia ... so little time that it IS scarcely credible that he completed enough course work to qualify for a degree. "How much time" "What was he doing and where?" Those are the real questions.
Root should know all about General Studies students and the GS programs. He should also tell us that fellows from the élite Ivy League Columbia College did not pal around with General Studies students, who with good reason or not, were usually viewed as oddballs. General Studies people were not Ivy Leaguers trying out for football, or crew. More importantly, they were certainly not required to take the then famous Core Curriculum (which is why Columbia College very rarely accepted transfers).
>"Nobody knew Obama at Columbia?"
(a) Not quite true as several have surfaced who did, and
(b) no big deal if the overwhelming majority of the Columbia College Class of 83 did not know him. Why would they? He wasn't one of them.
Root was a Poli Sci major, Obama claims the same. However we have no idea what Obama took and neither does Root. That's a real issue. It is quite possible that they never took the same Poli Sci courses ... or that Obama never took any Poli Sci courses at all.
That's why the records are important.... not that "nobody knew him."
On the "Who Paid?" question: it now turns out that Grandma Payne Dunham more than likely footed the bills during this period from the proceeds of a rather impressive oil-and-gas-lease trust fund of which she was the executrix.
Root first unveiled his story in 2008. He should have used the research available on this site and elsewhere to at least update the info before resurfacing.
Now if the Romney Campaign, is using surrogates to bring up the facts about Obama's strange college career, that's great. But inaccuracies in Root's revived story will quickly sidetrack the campaign into arguing about trivia.
Did Obama apply as a foreign student? If Grandma was paying, why would he? There are no student loans or scholarships on the record, despite what Obama himself would like you to believe. Of course, it would be nice for Occidental and Columbia to fork over their admission records ... but who is supposed to make them do that?
Root offers:
(a) nothing new.
(b) adds to the confusion with ... to say the very least ... misplaced emphasis
(c) Offers nothing actionable anywhere.
And does anyone think those two cargo ships headed for Mombasa (one was temporarily hijacked)about the same time was just a usual U.S volunteer relief shipment of supplies. These enigmas concerning Obama stretch an inquiring mind.
Ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.