Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Flotsam_Jetsome
The man has failed to demonstrably qualify for the office he currently occupies.

Thank you for your cogent thoughts. The above sentence says it all. It's as if Obama doesn't have the $10 ticket to get into the movie. He "fails to qualify" to enter the theater. It's almost as simple as that. He may have the ticket but won't show it. You and I along with many others think he doesn't have the ticket and can't get one. If he "snuck in," can the theater owners, aka "We the People," kick him out?

Like you Art, I too assumed (see what happens?) that there was some established, uniform and legal mechanism by which each and every presidential aspirant provide as a matter of formality even, a standard set of legal credentials establishing their eligibility for office.

At the very least, the upshot of this mess will hopefully be the establishment of a uniform and legal mechanism to verify a Presidential candidate's eligibility to run for POTUS.

Pinging a few people better versed than I on the constitutional (and historical and other legal) aspects of NBC and eligibility.

Looking forward to their comments.

34 posted on 06/04/2012 7:59:08 AM PDT by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Art in Idaho
I would point out that us birthers new of the 20th before the election, The Unqualified President, and had contacted our representative before the electoral count and informed them of the need to object. No one would commit. You need one from each body.
51 posted on 06/05/2012 6:47:54 AM PDT by GregNH (If you are unable to fight, please find a good place to hide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson