Hardly...they're laying a solid foundation for future birther lawsuits.
This document reads like a classic FR birther thread. They articulate the Taitz claim, and then rebut it.
Sloppy birther legal strategery is helping establish anti-birther precedent. These folks are using numerous previous losses to buttress their case... and "RICO" may have been the last straw. I think they want to put an end to Orly's antics once and for all. Besides...the Dems would love to have her in California running against Feinstein.
There have already about 100 so-called birther lawsuits. It's taken this long for someone to lay down a "solid foundaton"??? ... and sorry, but the motion reads like a classic Fogger and Faither disinformation website. The "anti-birther precedents" have been all over the road ... one assumes Obama was born in Hawaii ... with no legal evidence to support the assumption ... another simply says that proving his place of birth is irrelevant ... another says that the NBC precedent is in Ankeny ... another says it's in Minor, but only for defining NBC outside of the Constitution, which is true, but undermines the conclusion made by the judges. There's certainly sloppy strategery, but it's not just on the part of so-called birthers.