Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Hotlanta Mike
So then, what gives you even a faint hope that this judge is going to in any way support the crank Birther theories that have been cooked up over the last three plus years?

Perhaps this judge is hoping to try and shut Birthers up by making a formal pronouncement that everything is fine and dandy. And that BHO is an NBC and gets to be on the ballot?

37 posted on 01/07/2012 4:18:35 PM PST by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: El Sordo

Just the facts denier. Is Obama a natural born citizen, yes or no?

The Framers of the Constitution will have their day in court here in Atlanta later this month.

You can go off on your bc rants all you want. The fact is that several states REQUIRE that the candidates for state and federal office meet the necessary Constitutional requirements respectively.

In the case of POTUS, Obama FAILS to qualify regardless of having been elected the first time around and thereby having usurped the office of POTUS.

You can start packing away your Hope & Change memorabilia now...


38 posted on 01/07/2012 4:38:34 PM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: El Sordo

‘Georgia case could determine whether Obama’s name may be placed on 2012 state ballot…ANY 2012 state ballot!’

...In October of last year, attorney Van R. Irion of the Liberty Legal Foundation filed lawsuits against the Democrat Party both in Tennessee and at the federal level, “…requesting injunctions prohibiting the Party from certifying that Obama is Constitutionally qualified to run for the office of President in the 2012 election.” (2)

It was this same complaint that comprises the Georgia case for which a hearing is scheduled on January 26th.

Irion’s action has nothing whatever to do with the validity of the birth certificate Obama’s minions posted online last year. And the attorney doesn’t care whether Obama was born in Hawaii or not.

“The only fact relevant to this case,” says Irion, “is the fact that the defendant’s father was not a U.S. citizen.” It is Irion’s contention that as Obama’s father was not born in the US and was never a citizen, Obama himself cannot meet the Constitutional standard requiring that a president be “natural born.” (1)

Irion cites an 1875 Supreme Court ruling in which the court stated:

The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. (3)

If Irion is successful in obtaining an injunction preventing the Democrat Party from certifying Obama on the Georgia ballot, it will also act to prevent his Party certification and therefore appearance on ANY state ballot nationwide. (2)

http://www.coachisright.com/georgia-case-could-determine-whether-obama%E2%80%99s-name-may-be-placed-on-2012-state-ballot%E2%80%A6any-2012-state-ballot/


39 posted on 01/07/2012 4:43:12 PM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: El Sordo

This nation’s highest judicial authority defined the term natural-born citizen in accordance with Article II in a way that precludes Obama from being Constitutionally eligible for office. What compelling authority does this judge have for NOT following this legal precedent??


45 posted on 01/08/2012 1:56:51 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson