Posted on 10/03/2011 10:53:27 AM PDT by MichCapCon
What these folks are missing is that it’s not just corporate influence on gov’t. It’s gov’t abuse of its power. The corruption goes both ways.
It’s not just corrupt business folks trying to get gov’t to give them a bigger market share, it’s corrupt gov’t folks giving businesses a hard time if they don’t ante up into the game.
Politicians love to be able to grant favors to friends and ignore, if not outright harm, enemies. If gov’t didn’t do that, there wouldn’t be as much of a need for lobbyists.
.
I live in a dry county. At every opportunity I tell people that prohibition was one of the most stupid things our country ever did, and our county is so stupid it is still doing it.
And the counties are so small around here that I can just drive to the border of the next county and get whatever I want, and all the tax dollars go into that county. Kinda funny, actually.
oops, had two windows open at the same time.
My post above does not apply here.
When government treats the citizenry as children, it gets exactly that....
Social engineering through legislation. It’s a short step between telling someone they can’t by booze to telling someone what lightbulb they can use.
—a phenomenon economist Bruce Yandle dubbed “Bootleggers and Baptists,”—
Yep. Where I live there is a Babdis church behind every bush. And there really is still the “we’ll all be awash in collapse if we allow booze to be sold here” attitude.
But every election year it’s on the ballot. And every year we get closer to appeal. Last year we became a “moist” county. That means you can get alcohol, in the form of beer or wine, with your meal at a restaurant. But that’s it.
By next year or the year after it will probably finally be appealed.
I wish my town was dry, I don’t need drunk strangers pissing on the lawn at 4am.
Well, there is that “living right next to the bar” thing.
Well, there is that “living right next to the bar” thing.
No, not really. When prohibition was passed, if someone wanted to be law-abidding, they could simply stop drinking. No one was forcing them to drink alcoholic beverages. They didn't have to drink them to survive. If they broke the law, it was because they chose to do so.
I'm not addressing prohibition itself - just this silly comment.
Is Jack Daniels still made in a dry county? I always found that little factoid to be hilarious.
I don’t know. I believe it is the only “famous” Tennessee bourbon. I was at the Bourbon festival in Bardstown a few weeks ago. Lots to choose from but I don’t remember seeing Jack Daniels.
I drove by the Jim Beam main plant, Heaven Hills and Makers Mark plant yesterday and I believe they are all in Marion county, Kentucky. That is not a dry county.
Yes, Lynchburg is dry. In that part of the country, I guess running a still in a dry county is a time-honored tradition. ;-)
You didn’t see Jack at the Bourbon festival, because it isn’t bourbon, it is sourmash whiskey.
Jack Daniel's probably wasn't invited, it being a Tennessee Whiskey rather than a bourbon. It's the charcoal-filtering that takes it down an "unorthodox" path, IIRC.
>>>
Yes, Lynchburg is dry. In that part of the country, I guess running a still in a dry county is a time-honored tradition. ;-). <<<
And NASCAR is very grateful for said tradition. ;-)
But usually, such stills don’t advertise. LOL!
Apparently, you did not read my full post. I explicitly indicated I was not talking about prohibition itself. I simply stated that it was silly to claim that passing the law forced people to become lawbreakers. If they broke the law, they did so by choice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.