New Letter Calls out NMB’s Blatantly Pro-Unionization Agenda [Corrupt Union Politics]

ATR ^ | 2011-05-19 | Cory Eucalitto

[92nina]

...This direct push for unionization by regulation betrays any sense of public confidence in the nation’s federal agencies. It proves that the objective of NMB is hardly “the prompt and orderly resolution of disputes arising out of the negotiation of new or revised collective bargaining agreements” as their own mission declares. Instead, NMB and other federal agencies are puppets of Big Labor. Unions like AFA and IAM have proven that they will stop at nothing to achieve this goal, including co-opting our nation’s regulatory agencies who are all too frequently more than willing to assist them. Luckily, the House of Representatives voted to overturn NMB’s minority rule change through Title IX of this year’s Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reauthorization bill. The bill is now headed to conference with the Senate, where the Title IX language was not included in their version. Ensuring that Title IX is included in the final FAA bill is a key step in winning the battle against Big Labor’s political agenda. In the meantime, the letter sent by Reps. Issa and Ross should receive the utmost attention of NMB officials and serve as a warning to all federal regulatory agencies attempting to implement a partisan agenda around the will of Congress and the people.

Read more: http://www.atr.org/new-letter-calls-nmbs-blatantly-pro-a6169#ixzz1MuRHmLmq

[92nina]

For Democrats, administrative abuse for partisan purposes is just about required.

Take this article and others I found to the fight to the Libs on their own turf; put the Left on the defensive at at Digg and at Reddit and in Delicious and Stumbleupon

[arderkrag]

[Corrupt Union Politics]

Is there any other kind?