The lying never stops with these guys. Virginia Sunahara as seen in the Hawaiian Department of Heath records:
And here too:
Does a dead person have a right to privacy? I don't think so.
Is it true that CNN flew Waidelich to Hawaii so he could ask for his birth certificate, only to try to prove the undisputed fact that a COLB is the default when a person requests their BC?
If that is all they were trying to prove, they could have asked anybody off the street in Hawaii to do the same and saved themselves the cost of the flights. They chose Waidelich specifically for the purpose of showing this BC#, which according to what both Janice Okubo and the HDOH Administrative Rules say is anomalous.
The more I see, the more I think CNN, the HDOH, and the folks at Fogbow had this thing planned in advance. By 6:17AM the morning after this piece aired on CNN I had a post at my blog from a Fogbow member pointing out that Waidelich’s number supposedly refutes the BC numbering claim made by Janice Okubo. Right on cue.
Somebody on my blog mentioned seeing conversation on Fogbow about one of their people calling in on a show where Corsi was being interviewed, presumably with the comment that the Waidelich BC# “proves” that the numbers were not given sequentially. And that commenter on my blog said that every time Corsi is on the air, there is somebody who makes that claim about Waidelich’s BC#. So there seems to be a deliberate campaign to use this BC# in order to get rid of questions about Obama’s BC#/date filed problem - and it started before daybreak the day after CNN aired the program.
What the HDOH, CNN, and the Fogbow folks don’t want to address is the FACT that Virginia Sunahara is in their birth index and yet they told me that they have no birth record for her. They also told me that nobody had requested her records, even though *I* had requested her record and they should have told me that they couldn’t do a search without knowing the name of the requestor.
They also don’t want to address the FACT that the HDOH has manipulated their 1960-64 birth index to allow legally-invalid records to be included.
You are absolutely right that anything from the HDOH can’t be trusted. I’ve got posts up at my blog which detail the lawlessness of that agency. If we had the rule of law any more there should have been a criminal investigation launched a long, long time ago - to investigate the actions of THE HDOH at the very least.
Showing the transaction logs for Virginia Sunahara, Barack Hussein Obama II, and Stig Waidelich would not compromise anybody’s privacy because the logs would only say when the record was created or accessed and what kind of action was taken on it. No information from the record itself would be disclosed. Anybody who wants to argue about the genuineness of either Obama’s or Waidelich’s record should be asked whether they believe the Hawaii government should disclose the transaction logs for these records so that the INTEGRITY OF THE HDOH can be put to public scrutiny.
I know of no reason why anybody should question that. But we’ll see what responses we get when we ask the defenders of both the Obama and Waidelich BC#’s whether they support compelling the HI government to disclose the transaction logs.
I would not doubt it. A check for his home address would help. There is no doubt that this was coordinated between Hawaii, the liberal news organs, and the White House. It all started to come together when Obama first said he was born in Hawaii talking to a crowd (and to ABC Steffy Snuffilufigous Interview) on the 13th or 14th of April. They were all ready to implement their game plan by that date. Before then, Obama would talk around it by saying I grew up in Hawaii, or I went to school in Hawaii, or he talked in a weird third person voice who said he was born in Hawaii.
The lying never stops with these guys. Virginia Sunahara as seen in the Hawaiian Department of Heath records:
And here too:
Does a dead person have a right to privacy? I don't think so.