How about this?
Find one, just one, document posted to the internet prior to April of this year that purports to be a single scan of a single document that exhibits multiple pixelations; and prove me wrong.
BAMIE BC II IS AN OBVIOUS FRAUD
Note: this is an unretouched image. You can duplicate this simply on your own machine by going to http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf. Once the document opens in your browser, specify that you want to view the document at 1000% (10x) magnification in the little dialog box in the toolbar above the document. Then scroll down about 60% and right about 60% to to get to where you can view the Dunham and Sinclair signatures at the same time. The different size pixels that make up the two different signatures could not occur in a single scan of an original document. This is prima facie evidence of fraud.
ML/NJ
Maybe the NRO guy can explain that one too LoL.
That's simply not true. Once again, this is an effect of an enhanced scan. I pulled up a PDF scan from Google Books (in this case, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland) and saw the exact same thing you claim is evidence of fraud.
Most likely, one signature, or part of the signature, was lighter and didn't get enhanced during the scan.
Please see post 147.
The fact that some items are solid-color and some are grayscaled are the result of a computer optimization process. If you detect items that should likely be black, and make them the same color, it allows you to save space in your final document.
We have a much higher resolution document that displays no such effect: ALL items in that document, including the black-pixel ones in the PDF, are GRAYSCALED. That is because a different file format and optimization process were used.