Why would that be? Every officer of government, at every level, swears before God to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.
Which imperatively requires that:
"No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law."It's not optional, whether you're a mayor or a governor or a president or a legislator, or whether you're sitting on the judicial bench at any level."No State shall deprive any person of life without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
My point was that no matter what the appointee's personal beliefs on the issue, ANY decision by the AK Supreme Court would be 'reviewed' by the US Supremes, so the AK Court has no final bearing on the matter.