Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Senators Corker and Alexander (TN) voted for the START Treaty
Self | 1-15-11 | 30Moves

Posted on 01/15/2011 3:24:05 PM PST by 30Moves

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 01/15/2011 3:24:10 PM PST by 30Moves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 30Moves

My senators - dumb as dirt!


2 posted on 01/15/2011 3:34:36 PM PST by NewCenturions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 30Moves

I was going to laugh at you for having such dopey RINO Senators. Especially Corker. Then I remembered. Bob Casey is still my Senator. Now I am crying.


3 posted on 01/15/2011 3:35:26 PM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 30Moves

Umm why did they need money to update your nuclear weapons facilities the START treaty is supposed to do away with them? Right?


4 posted on 01/15/2011 3:44:46 PM PST by EmilyGeiger ("January 29,2013....The end of an ERROR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 30Moves

Each old building must be tested for hazardous substances before, during, and after demolition. That’s an expensive way to make the facilities more efficient.


5 posted on 01/15/2011 3:47:14 PM PST by rfp1234 (Badgers? We don't need no stinkin' badgers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 30Moves

Should told they are now a target of the TEA party these coming elections


6 posted on 01/15/2011 3:48:11 PM PST by phockthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Maybe Casey can get a job dealing cards at an Ed Rendell casino! When he gets canned next time around. :)


7 posted on 01/15/2011 3:53:23 PM PST by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 30Moves

I don’t know...maybe I’m missing something. But voting on a treaty should NOT be based on what promises are made in the US...but rather what the terms are and whether it makes sense.

Overall...I prefer to simply ignore this treaty, because I know that if I studied it, I would NEVER get any sleep.


8 posted on 01/15/2011 3:57:13 PM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 30Moves

Worse yet is something I have heard Alexander say many times:

“we will still have enough nukes to blow anything they send over here to kingdom come”.

Is he serious? - what if they send an EMP? Will we use a nuke to knock it down?

As I understand it the SE portion of the US is mostly unprotected by a missile defense system.

Anyone know the facts?


9 posted on 01/15/2011 4:04:42 PM PST by 30Moves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewCenturions

I complained to them too, very early on...their response, more or less in unison, was that this Treaty did not damage the National Security of the US, despite what Senator Graham had concluded. Not a word about jobs. I then wrote them about the headlines in the Knoxville News Sentinel the day after the vote: ~~”Much Money for Oak Ridge” as a result of the Treaty being passed. They sound like “Ben Nelson” and “Nebraska,” second verse. I feel like spitting nails each time I think about this farce...look at how they both voted in the Lame Duck session, virtually as Demoncrats in support of Dear Leader...disgusting! Do I need to elaborate on my feelings?


10 posted on 01/15/2011 4:05:01 PM PST by jennings2004 (Sarah Palin: "The bright light at the end of a very dark tunnel!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 30Moves

It’s deals like this that are destroying our country. If DOD or executive branch has a suggestion about spending money to rennovate or change some facilities then it should be submitted as a bill to Congressional debate. Exchanging for votes subverts congressional deliberation on both sides — the bill being voted and the expense of the bribe.


11 posted on 01/15/2011 4:05:33 PM PST by Bhoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 30Moves
Politics as usual. I wonder if it's coming to an end; if there's been a paradigm shift or not...
12 posted on 01/15/2011 4:07:23 PM PST by MulberryDraw (Turn off the EPA, FCC, Federal Dept. of Education, ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MulberryDraw

I already let Corker know that the TEA Party is supporting someone else to take his place in 2012.

He loves to play in the sandbox with the big boys in DC.


13 posted on 01/15/2011 4:12:38 PM PST by 30Moves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 30Moves

In other words, they were bribed... with our money.


14 posted on 01/15/2011 4:19:35 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 30Moves

Hey, give them a break ... they got 30 Tyre shekels for Tennessee in return for their votes.


15 posted on 01/15/2011 4:24:30 PM PST by NonValueAdded (Palin 2012: don't retreat, just restock [chg'd to comply w/ The Civility in Discourse Act of 2011])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 30Moves
49 other states are staring at you 2 trough-pigs with focused disdain...


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

16 posted on 01/15/2011 4:28:28 PM PST by The Comedian ("Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice" - B. Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 30Moves

But, but, his Mommie said he was a “good boy.”


17 posted on 01/15/2011 4:45:23 PM PST by jennings2004 (Sarah Palin: "The bright light at the end of a very dark tunnel!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 30Moves

What is your solution? A New Cold War? If so, thanks but no thanks. We’re broke.


18 posted on 01/15/2011 5:09:20 PM PST by Captain Kirk (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

My solution - Perhaps a better treaty that would have allowed us to maintain and improve our defense systems. That language was in the preamble and so our government said that part wasn’t binding but the Russians say it is.

The Russians gave up things that don’t matter to them and we gave up things that were vital.

If we are so broke why the 1 Billion for pensions?


19 posted on 01/15/2011 6:14:26 PM PST by 30Moves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 30Moves
If we are so broke why the 1 Billion for pensions?

Are you serious? We are only able to pay for these pensions from borrowed and printed money. Is not only unsustainable but will ruin or economy if not reversed.

As to your other points, our Pentagon budget now has almost nothing to do with "defense" and everything to with world policing. The costs of world policing, including bases in 120 countries, now add up to a trillion per year!

20 posted on 01/15/2011 8:19:32 PM PST by Captain Kirk (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson