The reason that "deniers" don't have peer reviewed papers is that the journals pretty much refuse to publish their papers (the Climategate e-mails document that bit of the scam). It's a nice little bit of circular logic.
BTW, how many peer reviewed "climate change" papers has Dr. Al Gore had published?
You appear to have misunderstood. The peer reviewed “science” that climate change activists are so proud of were found to be fabrication and lies. My point is their vaunted peer reviews are not worth the paper they are written on. I probably didn't make this clear.