Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Voters Reject a VAT (Step Away From Value-Added Anything.)
ATR ^ | 11/8/10 | Ryan Ellis

Posted on 11/09/2010 11:17:49 AM PST by Andrea19

Now that the dust has settled from the great election tsunami of 2010, it's worth looking at some of the under-the-radar issues. One of these is public support for a value-added tax (VAT).

According to exit polling conducted by Kellyanne Conway's the polling company, inc./WomanTrend, a super-majority of voters oppose an add-on VAT:

Read more: http://www.atr.org/voters-reject-vat-a5631#ixzz14oUb19cy

(Excerpt) Read more at atr.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics; Reference
KEYWORDS: corruption; democrats; elections; taxation
A VAT in addition to the income tax is a bad concept, whether a majority of Americans support it or not; but it is pleasing to know the people do not support it presently.

Help promote Conservative activism here & here & here & here

1 posted on 11/09/2010 11:17:56 AM PST by Andrea19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Andrea19

Horrible, horrible deal. Glad to see 48 percent are strongly opposed.


2 posted on 11/09/2010 11:20:32 AM PST by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrea19

A VAT instead of Federal Income Taxes, Property Taxes and State Taxes and what the heck SS Taxes would be wonderful. I think they could go four percent on EVERYTHING and have plenty of funds. Does anyone agree with that 4 percent? Or would it have to be more?


3 posted on 11/09/2010 11:28:18 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrea19

“•63 percent of voters were opposed to a VAT.” That’s not that high, since - given other verbage in the article - they posed it as an “add-on” VAT (ie in addition to regular taxes).

Wonder what it would be if they posed it as “in place of” regular taxes?

Not that I would trust politicians to not claim the later but do the former anyway.

Two things about sales type taxes: They’re not progressive, and they’re harder to avoid with loopholes, etc.


4 posted on 11/09/2010 11:35:17 AM PST by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

“Does anyone agree with that 4 percent? Or would it have to be more?”

I would think much more.

I think federal spending is around 20% of GDP as it is - not to mention state and local.

Think more like 30%.


5 posted on 11/09/2010 11:37:17 AM PST by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
I was shopping for something on the Internet one night, when I looked at the item at a site that had what I wanted, I noticed the price was in Euros. Before leaving the site I noticed the VAT on the item. It was 17% I don't know if this is an across the board rate or just for that category of items.
6 posted on 11/09/2010 11:39:11 AM PST by rightly_dividing (1 Corinthians 15:1-4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pessimist
But a consumption tax is tied to consumption. So, if we stop consuming, then revenues drop and the government bureaucrats panic. They would never allow the taxpayers to have that much control.
7 posted on 11/09/2010 3:01:07 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson