Posted on 11/04/2010 4:21:34 AM PDT by 1234
Quite by accident, in 2004 I launched what has become one of the most formidable political movements in American history. The media call us Birthers, but that is not really correct. I accept the term Birther because it is simple and direct and immediate.... I am more accurately described as a Doubter. Birthers are really Doubters. In 2008 Republican Party leaders were afraid to confront the Birther/Doubter questions about Obama and they lost the election. If Republicans avoid the Birther/Doubter movement in 2012 they will lose again. I am working to see that the questions about Obamas character and history are presented in a reasonable and coherent manner. For myself, I continue to believe Obama was born in Hawaii. But he is concealing the full information contained on his original 1961 birth certificate. Why? It is time for Obama to tell the truth to the American people and to authorize Hawaii officials to release the original, typewritten birth certificate. Because Obama has not been candid about his past, nearly 100 million Americans now doubt Obamas origins. That is an extraordinary number. The number will be increasing after November 2nd. There is nothing like the Birther/Doubter movement in past presidential history....There is no doubt that the Birther/Doubter movement played a significant sub silento role in Obamas defeat yesterday. Worries about Obama involve questions and doubts about his authenticity, loyalty and origins. While these voter concerns may largely be unspoken, they are there. They are real. They are the proverbial elephant in the room which Republican leaders ignore at their peril.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
“You already admitted you were lying when you said all naturalized citizens had naturalization certificates. So we know you lie. Thanks for admitting it.
Lying is unAmerican.”
Naturalization certificates have been around for a very long time. Here’s a link to a copy of the Naturalization Certificate issued to the father of President Chester A. Arthur, William Arthur, on August 31, 1843.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/11067180/William-Arthur-father-of-President-Chester-Arthur-Naturalization-certificate-1843-Congress
You are correct to point out that he is a US Code citizen and therefore a usurper.”
There is no way under the sun that Chief Justice Roberts would have agreed to swear in an ineligible usurper and then invite him to the Supreme Court for a social get-together with the other Justices. It would NEVER happen.
Thanks for admitting that you have some kind of psychotic non-existent personal relationship in your own mind with governmental officials whereby you think you can attest to their personal integrity.
It is not surprising that an admitted anti-American liar also has delusional psychotic tendencies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.