Soros's Learning Curve

grey_whiskers | 11-03-2010 | grey_whiskers

[GOPJ]

During the last election cycle, there was a great deal of fuss about how the Democrats magically gained several close races for their candidates in the US Senate. You know, the stories of counts and re-counts; of felons voting; of bundles of ballots found in the trunk of a car. Think all these were a coincidence? I don't.

Here's a way dems did voter fraud in the past (one of the ways): First, the race had to be close. The win had to be within the margin of error to be believable. To try to cheat on a blowout wouldn't work because it calls attention to the process of cheating. "Additional votes" generally come in 'very late' to be counted - the reason is cheaters don't want to put in too many extra votes - again - that brings unwanted attention (look for polls closing at 7 pm and votes not getting "in" to be counted until after midnight). And the precincts that deliver the fraudulent votes are usually 'safe' and invariable black. (It's been decades since I was a dem - so they've probably added to the old techniques - but this was a commonly used way to cheat the vote years ago)

Whenever this pattern exists it should be looked at...

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks grey_whiskers.

[unspun]

We published it yesterday, thank you.

http://gulagbound.com/8103/soros-learning-curve

Feel free to offer more. You understand we’re at war.