To: OldGoatCPO
No. The qualifications of being a Senator are actually very low. Witness Al Franken. And Schumer. And Boxer. And Graham.
The point is she does not have what it takes to be electable. And I don't mean that she's too conservative because conservative is very electable. I mean that she's (1) stupid and (2) has a lot of baggage. Being qualified means nothing if you can't win.
66 posted on
10/13/2010 8:27:42 PM PDT by
conimbricenses
(Red means run son, numbers add up to nothing.)
To: conimbricenses
For the record, I think you’re stupid and probably have a lot of baggage.
There
How do you like it, bozo?
68 posted on
10/13/2010 8:32:17 PM PDT by
Catsrus
(Have)
To: conimbricenses
I have followed (like others) what isgoing on in DE, I am not convinced the there is a spin that she is as you said “stupid” abd she has “baggage.” I do not see anything suggestine her opponent is any smarter. I know some very smart people who bought into the Palin is dumb spin and still believe it.
To: conimbricenses
I have followed (like others) what is going on in DE, I am not convinced the there is a spin that she is as you said “stupid” abd she has “baggage.” I do not see anything suggesting her opponent is any smarter. I know some very smart people who bought into the Palin is dumb spin and still believe it.
To: conimbricenses
One, she isn't stupid.
Two. the reason she is so far down in the polls is because the RINO Castle hasn't endorsed her, so she is only getting 67% of the vote.
That is where the criticism should be directed.
93 posted on
10/14/2010 9:32:29 AM PDT by
fortheDeclaration
(When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson