What you have done is post information that has been dealt with by her already.
Except it hasn't, because to you "dealt with" = ignored and/or distorted, much as you attempted to do with the Oxford issue.
It really is a simple matter - either she claimed a certificate FROM Oxford or she did not. And either she graduated from Farleigh-Dickinson in 1993 or she did not. There is no in between. There is no partial credit awarded from a "similar" program that happened to be renting space AT Oxford. And there is no diploma-in-waiting that's yours while caught up on a bureaucratic snag for 17 years, as NONE of that justifies her claiming things that she did not have.
And that makes her a liar, much like you.
Simple enough?