[conimbricenses]

The term "mud slinging" implies that the criticism being offered is factually misconstrued or unfair. Yet I've said nothing about O'Donnell that isn't factually accurate or a valid reflection on her character. You have thrown out Coons, Castle, and repetitive denial to obfuscate those facts, but nothing to challenge or undermine their basic truths:

1. She repeatedly falsified multiple education credentials on her resume.

2. She filed an absurdly frivolous lawsuit against a conservative organization that fired her over her poor personal ethics as exemplified in those resume falsifications.

3. She has a personal financial history that makes her a prime candidate for the Community Reinvestment Act.

Sure, she's still not as bad as Coons. But simply not being Coons is a pretty low bar to set, and it certainly doesn't make her a good thing!

[fortheDeclaration]

O'Donnell appeared on Hannity a few weeks ago and addressed the issues you have complained about.

She answered them to the satisfaction of even Rove.

You are indeed 'mud slinging' since you are posting information that is subjective, opinionated and irrelevant to the central issue, who will be the next Senator from Delaware.

So, it will be either Coons or O'Donnell-it is quite that simple.