Posted on 10/13/2010 6:31:01 PM PDT by Talkradio03
Clearly, according to your stated view on the voters intellectual shortcomings, we need individuals such Castle and yourself to protect the voters from their stupidity
And as I said, that would be a non-sequitur.
"Voters tend to be stupid" ≠ "We need Mike Castle"
In fact, the two propositions are not even related to each other, nor have I even made the second claim. It would appear that you share Ms. O'Donnell's habits with truthfulness.
And here I thought the "creepy" ones were atheist Libertarians that want to legalize every morally corrupt thing under the sun (homosexuality, drug abuse, prostitution, suicide, pornography, etc. etc. etc.). Murder? LMAO. While atheist Libertarians are all about murdering the innocent unborn (50 million in a 37 year period here in the US alone), going against the laws of God is not my "thing". Let me put it this way con: you're hardly worth eternal damnation. Let me ask you this: what are your thoughts on motorized wheelchairs? (wink).
Go ahead and report that all you want, NAMBLA pervert. Your behavior provides ample documentation as to why any normal person should be leery of you and your bizarre & repeated advances on complete strangers.
It was more or less a note to the administrators givng them a "heads up" on your conduct. I've worked around vermin like you before con. You get away with one thing, you'll definitely do it again with others.
By the way, had any unwanted encounters with Chris Hanson lately? Cause I think I saw you or somebody really like you on that show.
I had to look up who this "Chris Hanson" is (it appears that the con here takes quite in interest in stories about predators.
We live in two different worlds: your atheist Libertarian philosophy embraces homosexuals and child molesters, my Christian conservative principles abhor them.
Oh and one more thing atheist Libertarian:
Christine O'Donnell for Senator!
And the school she was afflited with, gave her glowing comments as well.
Now, the only one lying is you, the fact is either she or Coons is going to be the next senator of Del.
Clearly you prefer Coons.
Stop slandering her without hard evidence.
Let me ask you this: what are your thoughts on motorized wheelchairs? (wink).
Is that a new fetish of yours? Wheelchair porn? Wow. You're even an oddball among oddballs in the NAMBLA crowd.
It was more or less a note to the administrators givng them a "heads up" on your conduct.
And I'm certain they are enthused to hear whiny tattle-taling from a guy whose last week of posting activity here consists of little more than (1) posting the NAMBLA website on FR, (2) attempting to use FR to lure complete strangers into an encounter at an undisclosed location near where you live, and (3) posting a variety of threats and other insinuations of violence against the person you are hoping to lure there.
Way to draw attention to yourself, dipsh*t.
The simple fact is Christine O'Donnell LIED about multiple degrees and certifications on her resume. In any job that would be grounds for firing, and if she was a Democrat you'd be calling her out for it. But since you're infatuated with her, you are also completely blind to her many faults and therefore give her a pass.
If she's such a loser, they shouldn't waste their time and energy. Plus we have all these old time Rino’s showing up on these threads to prove what we've always thought about old time Rino’s.
Mike Castle, a repulsive cretin, betrayer, and traitor to what we believe, got knocked off, ending his career as a professional Judas. Now we hear all these screaming Rino’s telling us how much better off we would have been having him to vote with us on senate organizational matters and with Democrats on everything else.
O'Donnell takes on three libs in one debate and is still a loser. Sometimes I think a bunch of Kos and DU plants have accounts here. That's the same type of crap they post over there.
She took a course AT Oxford.
Now, show we go into the 45 years of Castle and see what he is guilty of?
Update: Apparently, O’Donnell’s Oxford “instructor” enjoyed having her in class. (Via TalkingPointsMemo):
[Bruce W.] Griffin, who once wrote O’Donnell a recommendation to an Ivy league grad school, wrote up a full endorsement that he considers the [The Phoenix Institute/Oxford-based] course equivalent to “any graduate school at any university.” From his posting:
The course we did that summer in Oxford is nearly a decade old, but the basic issues we addressed are eternal. Today, too many of the Republic’s leaders have abandoned the natural law tradition of the Declaration of Independence for a murky moral relativism—a relativism that is both destructive of democratic values and philosophically bankrupt. Christine O’Donnell would bring to the US Senate a deepened commitment to the philosophical convictions of the Founding Fathers at a time when the philosophical bankruptcy of too many leaders is mirrored in the economic bankruptcy of the federal government. She would surely add intellectual and philosophical depth to a Senate that at this point in its history badly needs both.
Then this explanation that further backs up O’Donnell...
Here’s how Griffin explains it:
Although we were never an Oxford University course, we drew heavily on the faculties of Oxford and Cambridge for our lectures. The organizers had put together a star-studded cast of lecturers, and partly as a result we drew students from Latin America, the US, and Europe.
In a followup interview, Griffin told TPM the Phoenix program was definitely not an Oxford course, but that it was more than just renting space at Oxford. “Our lecturers were drawn heavily from the Oxford faculty, and the opportunity to hear those lecturers was a critical reason for why our students came,” he said.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2600372/posts?page=3
I checked it.
Same partial truths that is repeated by the rest of the MSM.
Putting down 'Oxford' when you attended classes AT Oxford is no intention to deceive anyone. She wasn't hiding the fact that it wasn't Oxford University itself that she graduated from.
So, show we look now at the Castle's 45 years in politics living off the taxpayer?
She listed it as a "certificated awarded" FROM Oxford.
Even the organization that ran the program there described that line on her resume as "misleading." And I'll go one step further - it's intentionally dishonest.
Whether it’s an “equivalent” course is NOT the issue though. The issue is that she claimed she had a certification FROM Oxford University when she did not. That’s called - you guessed it - LYING.
Are you sure that you are rebutting my comments? I at no time called her a loser. I was injecting to the haters that at the very least she was doing a very significant thing. In my quote I was openly asking the “O’Donnell sucks” people a question. I contribute cash and I don’t even live in DE. I also thing that even if she loses she did us a major solid by flushing Castle down the toilet.
There are real haters here that you should school, not I.
The link you sent me simply said Oxford University on it.
So, again, you want to discuss Castles voting against the Constitution over 45 years-now that IS something to be ashamed of.
That is YOUR opinion.
But the FACT is that Castle is for CAP and TRADE and has an 'F' rating from the NRA.
But you are harping on her resume?
I think your priorities are a bit misplaced and distorted.
She did it multiple times in applications for multiple jobs, including the one she got fired from and later sued for frivolous “gender discrimination.” With that kind of a pattern, it becomes a case of intentional dishonesty.
2. She said she got a certification from Oxford. She had no such certification from Oxford. She therefore LIED about having a certification from Oxford. There really isn't any way around that reality, your false pleas of ignorance and attempts to divert attention onto Castle notwithstanding.
1. Accused me of supporting Coons, which I do not, have never done, and have never even hinted at doing.
2. Accused me of supporting Castle, which I do not, have never done, and have never even hinted at doing.
You simply made those things up and falsely attached them to me without any evidence to back them. That makes you a liar. And since you have done it many times, it would appear that your lies are widespread and intentional.
Now, she is running against someone else who is against the Constitution.
But you would rather continue to rant and rave about her school records.
Your agenda is clear to anyone reading your posts, to discourage people from voting for her.
I don't have the records of those issues to see for myself firsthand, but the Republicans of Del. have made their choice.
And your posts are cases of intentional mud slinging.
So, your attacks on her character, can only lead one to the rational conclusion you are supporting Coons.
Now you want to continue these useless rants of yours, go right ahead.
I will redirect the posts back to Coons, since it is either her or him that is going to be the next Del. senator.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.