Glenn Beck explains the dangers of Black Liberation Theology

The Collins Report ^ | July 18, 2010 | Suzanne Eovaldi, staff writer

[jmaroneps37]

When Barack Obama said right before he was elected that the U.S. was days away from fundamental change, he meant changing our Capitalist system's basis for growth from individual achievement to a collective salvation based on redistribution of our wealth.

And clearly, his executive power has achieved this control in just about every legislative agenda he has initiated.

Glenn Beck's analysis of the driving philosophy behind Obama's governance by far left ideology to pervert our country's founding principles is very revealing. Beck said the Liberation Theology theory of social justice instead of natural law is a "perversion of God (and is) dangerous." Anthony Bradley, a Beck guest, says this ideology of seeking to liberate the oppressed has infused the United States to its core, especially in its transforming young minds in our country's public school system.

James Cone, a founder of Black Liberation Theology, "refuses to accept (a) God who does not belong to the black community." Cone said, "Whites must give back what they took. . .give back your job or your money." Author Bradley said this in reality is an effort "to punish the oppressor;” to grab power.

Identifying what to control, linking the methods to Marxism, and then creating victims according to Beck are the Obama crowd's modus operandi for completely changing America's thrust of individual achievement and personal responsibility into a country of social justice built on a perversion of Christianity. BLT centers on the notion of collective salvation in direct conflict with the teachings of Jesus and individual salvation says Beck.

Incumbent upon the Progressives' takeover of the United States is their use of victimhood to exploit and foment minorities and to divide us along racial lines.By basing their actions on the teachings of failed Communism and Marxism, Beck says they....

[happyathome]

Absolutely on Dept of Ed - should have thought of that. Energy too?

[magooey]

The Department of Energy may have some crucial pieces such as the Atomic Energy Commission. Also, there may be some national security programs that had been shifted from Defense. As far as the goal of energy indepedence, it has been a failure. I'd bet a good chunk of Energy could be cut or transferred to the States.

You have raised a very nice issue. Hopefully it will get more traction.