“However the Republicans must have a candidate who can also win...”
That is the big problem...however, figuring out if the candidate can win seems to be an impossible science. If you look at 2008, you had a very well experienced person who reached across the the aisle time and time again, against a total radical with virtually no experience...
The moral of the story is that the candidate who can do the best to bring out his base wins - and Sarah certainly WAS doing that, and it scared the hell out of the MSM. It is up to Sarah to maintain that capability...if she can, she wins - it’s that simple.
Regarding Romney he also created a super political problem for himself by signing the Massachusetts healthcare bill into law. The Massachusetts healthcare plan is similar to Obamacare in many aspect. Like Obamacare it is not an outright take over of the private healthcare system but also like Obamacare it certainly leads to massive spending, more taxes to get the money for spending, and on the long run in may very well lead to the destructive socialized medicine. Of course Obamacar is nationwide whereas Romneycare is Massachusetts but still it is a super problem for Romney if he decides to run for President.
I would like to see the nomination won by a good Republican governor who has governed at least for two terms or even a a strong Republican Senator but my preference is for the experienced governor.
The voters would decide in 2012 who is the Republican nominee and who is the President. Hopefully we will defeat Obama and his destructive socialism in the 2012 elections.