[Brices Crossroads]

“I watched the interview in delight.”

I have to say that only those in serious denial can genuinely believe this woman is not serious. She is serious, charismatic and a principled conservative.

I watched the interview and she is so at ease and well informed. But she refuses to use the jargon of the elites. I noticed that Hannity asked her about the ridiculous column by Joe Klein, accusing her of borderline sedition. She came to a point in her reply where she could have used the term seditious, but chose other, more common words instead...not because she did not know what seditious meant but because some of her audience may not have known. She is the Great Communicator. It is why she connects with her audience, and it drives the libs up the wall. They want her to talk like a freaking lawyer....People generally detest lawyers and especially lawyer speak.

[Al B.]

I just went back and watched that part of the interview and you make a fantastic point. Instead of using the word 'sedition' in her answer to Sean's question (Sean actually used the word), she finished her answer with "inciting of violence and rebellion". This woman actually defined the word sedition for her audience in language the ordinary person would understand.

Sorry you lousy hacks in the LSM, Sarah Palin is WAY too sophisticated for you. Try and keep up. :)