Posted on 04/21/2010 2:22:47 PM PDT by Starman417
Now, they are not just racists but violent extremists!
It's been more than a month since Democrats launched the grand distraction to take attention away from their power grab in ramming the health care bill down our throats. First, the Tea Partiers were racists, claimed black congressmen, even though no proof was ever found.
Now, Dems claim that opposition to Obama's radical agenda may cause violence and terrorism on the scale of the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995.
Monday, Mata mused on how left wing media seemed to be marching in lockstep trying to make a connection between America's second worst terrorist attack and the Tea Parties. Mata noticed how one reporter after another expressed concern that continuing protests against Obama and the Dems would inspire violence.
As usual, it's no accident that these reporters voiced these nearly identical concerns. They got their marching orders from the top.
Read more at floppingaces.net...
The most infamous Rahmbo story of them all is the one that begins with the dinner the night after Bill Clinton was elected in 1992. Among those present at the dinner table was ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos, who watched while an overwrought and clearly exhausted Emanuel began ranting at a long list of Clinton "enemies." As he shouted each name, he stabbed the table with his steak knife: "Nat Landow! Dead! Cliff Jackson! Dead!" Apparently, others joined in.
And no accident that CAIR was among them.
IN his book, George Stephanopoulos is quoted Clinton thusly:
“When someone is in my way or a problem for me, I just kill them.”
But that isn’t hate speech or anything.
Nice graphic!
Why is Bil Clinton still a political voice?
Why are the pubbies not yelling Rapist or liar every time that bastard opens his mouth?
Clinton an angry old, dried up, impeached prune.
and yet, i'll bet that 51% of the party is female...
Uhhhh, Clinton and the current DC gangsters may cause problems, on the order of the American Revolution, with their complete shredding of the US Constitution. But then only a _real_ American would know much about the limited national gov. _required_ by our _real_ law.
The DC gang and anyone else can lawfully change USA away from a limited national gov. by creating an amendment to the US Constitution. Until then, more than one _law_ _passed_ by DC remain NULL and VOID by my US Constitution.
“When someone is in my way or a problem for me, I just kill them’’ Careful Billy Boy, as ye sow, so shall ye reap.
Bill Clinton was in OKC tonight to accept an award, gave a speech and said the federal government was not blameless, Ruby Ridge, Waco.
| Historically, racism has always risen or fallen with the rise or fall of collectivism. Collectivism holds that the individual has no rights, that his life and work belong to the group (to "society," to the tribe, the state, the nation) and that the group may sacrifice him at its own whim to its own interests. The only way to implement a doctrine of that kind is by means of brute force -- and statism has always been the poltical corollary of collectivism. The absolute state is merely an institutionalized form of gang rule, regardless of which particular gang seizes power. And -- since there is no rational justification for such rule, since none has ever been or can ever be offered -- the mystique of racism is a crucial element in every variant of the absolute state. The relationship is reciprocal: statism rises out of prehistorical tribal warfare, out of the notion that the men of one tribe are the natural prey for the men of another -- and establishes its own internal sub-categories of racism, a system of castes determined by a man's birth, such as inherited titles of nobility or inherited serfdom. The racism of Nazi Germany -- where men had to fill questionnaires about their ancestry for generations back, in order to prove their "Aryan" descent -- has its counterpart in Soviet Russia, where men had to fill similar questionnaires to show that their ancestors had owned no property and thus to prove their "proletarian" descent. The Soviet ideology rest on the notion that men can be conditioned to communism genetically -- that is, that a few generations conditioned by dictatorship will transmit communist ideology to their descendants, who will be communists at birth. The persecution of racial minorities in Soviet Russia, according to the racial descent and whim of any given commissar, is a matter of record; anti-semitism is particularly prevalent -- only the official pogroms are now called "political purges." There is only one antidote to racism: the philosophy of individualism and its politico-economic corollary, laissez-faire capitalism. Individualism regards man -- every man -- as an independent, sovereign entity who possesses an inalienable right to his own life, a right derived from his nature as a rational being. Individualism holds that a civilized society, or any form of association, cooperation or peaceful co-existence among men, can be achieved only on the basis of the recognition of individual rights -- and that a group, as such, has no rights other than the individual rights of its members. It is not a man's ancestors or relatives or genes or body chemistry that count in a free market, but only one human attribute: productive ability. It is by his own individual ability and ambition that capitalism judges a man and rewards him accordingly. No political system can establish universal rationality by law (or by force). But capitalism is the only system that functions in a way which rewards rationality and penalizes all forms of irrationality, including racism. A fully free, capitalist system has not yet existed anywhere. But what is enormously significant is the correlation of racism and political controls in the semi-free economies of the 19th century. Racial and/or religious persecutions of minorities stood in inverse ratio to the degree of a country's freedom. Racism was strongest in the more controlled economies, such as Russia and Germany -- and weakest in England, the then freest country of Europe. -- excerpted from the article "Racism" by Ayn Rand, published in the September, 1963 issue of The Objectivist Newsletter, excerpts of which can be found HERE. |
"The left attempts to brand us tea party patriots as haters, while in reality they are the ones spewing hate from deep within their souls." -- Lloyd Marcus, April 2nd, 2010 here: http://www.lloydmarcus.com/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.