Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan
it provides that such “third person” must not only secure the consent of the law officers of the government, but the consent of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia before he can use the name of the government in quo warranto proceedings.

Taitz didn't get the consent of the relevant law officers of the government, and she didn't even make an effort to get the consent of the Supreme Court of DC before she filed.

95 posted on 04/17/2010 11:16:14 AM PDT by browardchad ("Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own fact." - Daniel P Moynihan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: browardchad

Yep. She’s an incompetent, attention whore, with schizophrenic tendencies. As I’ve said before, she couldn’t properly file her paperwork or interpret a judicial ruling if Chief Justice Roberts himself explained everything to her word for word in Russian.


96 posted on 04/17/2010 11:27:21 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson