Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: EnderWiggins

giggy-Puff

The 1790 Naturalization Act says exactly nothing about wives taking the citizenship condition of their husbands. Since that was the first naturalization act, your claim here is not supported by any law.

I never stated that the 1790 Naturalization Act, stated such. Wiggie - assumed.

WiggyFool stated Barack Obama was born on US Soil.

Where has he proven that? There is no confirmation based on a forged document. Where is the doctor’s or witness signiture verifing that Barack Hussein Obama was born anywhere on/in/around the United States? Where?

Again, being born also requires complete, sole, and undivided jurisdiction, which Barack Hussein Obama can never be under as he’s was already a British subject.


1,010 posted on 02/17/2010 1:43:17 PM PST by syc1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1008 | View Replies ]


To: syc1959
"I never stated that the 1790 Naturalization Act, stated such. Wiggie - assumed."

I assumed nothing. I pointed ou that your claim regarding the assumed citizenship of wives has no support in the law. You appear here to agree with me. See? We are in violent agreement on at least this one issue.

"There is no confirmation based on a forged document.""

Yawn... if you had any evidence that it was forged, you'd have taken it to court. There wouldn't even be an issue of standing to do that. It would be a slam dunk.

"Again, being born also requires complete, sole, and undivided jurisdiction, which Barack Hussein Obama can never be under as he’s was already a British subject."

There you go again calling the United States an inferior nation.

And you call yourself a "patriot?"


What part of this Supreme Court decision do you not understand?

"The jurisdiction of the nation within its own territory is necessarily exclusive and absolute. It is susceptible of no limitation not imposed by itself. Any restriction upon it, deriving validity from an external source, would imply a diminution of its sovereignty to the extent of the restriction, and an investment of that sovereignty to the same extent in that power which could impose such restriction. All exceptions, therefore, to the full and complete power of a nation within its own territories must be traced up to the consent of the nation itself. They can flow from no other legitimate source."
1,012 posted on 02/17/2010 1:53:08 PM PST by EnderWiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1010 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson