Counsel for DNC Services Corporation Performs 3 Card Monte for Federal Court

jbjd ^ | 11.23.09 | jbjd

[jbjd]

... Question: But given that Bob Bauer was willing to risk his license to practice law by tricking the court into taking judicial notice of misleading facts that, at best, could only establish Barack Obama was a “native” born citizen, anyway, and which notice he would have to message in order to dupe Americans into believing this meant, his client was also Constitutionally qualified for POTUS; why was he unwilling to risk his license on Nancy Pelosi’s Certifications, which explicitly stated, his client was Constitutionally qualified for the job of POTUS, judicial notice of which fact the court likely would have granted, and which notice more likely could have persuaded the public of the fact, his client was Natural Born? Answer: Because at that time, Nancy Pelosi was his client, too, and under the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct, he could not exonerate one client facing a civil lawsuit by incriminating another in criminal election fraud.

[jbjd]

Of course he dropped this. Because no NH law requires the candidate whose name appears on the ballot to be qualified for the job. When my work was stolen, the thieves joined together to apply my concept of election fraud to NH. Only, this was not an applicable state for the complaints of election fraud to the AG, filed in applicable states like HI, GA, MD, TX, SC, and VA. Plus, they took it to the SoS, a state constitutional officer with no jurisdiction into criminal matters but whose authority only extends to ruling on the validity of the ballot in NH according to NH law. Their charge? BO committed fraud when he signed the application to get his name printed on the Presidential primary ballot. Big mistake. Because charging him with fraud meant proving he lied. What I mean is, he knows whether he is a NBC. So, in order to go after him, you would have to prove, he lied. That’s why I went after anyone else who Certified he was a NBC, like Nancy Pelosi, or Boyd Richie. How did THEY know he was a NBC before Certifying he was, and sending that Certification to state election officials? By forging ahead with the concept they stole from me, these thieves almost blew our legitimate causes of action. What do you suppose would have happened if the NH SoS had ruled, there was no ballot fraud? (And there wasn’t, in NH.) The AG in TX, where there WAS fraud, could have said, ‘Well, the SoS in NH has determined there was no ballot fraud and so, as far as I am concerned, the case is closed.’ Thank goodness, all the NH SoS did was refer the complaint ostensibly lodged by the NH state Rep. - did you know he was a named Plaintiff in one of Orly’s cases? - to the AG, who would not touch it.

Stealing my work is not only wrong on its face; it is also subverting the mission of that work. My readers are (or are becoming) educated voters. They have read the articles on my blog and asked questions. They sent in their complaints understanding what they were signing their names to. There is no shortcut here. You have to put in the time to become an informed voter. At least, you have to know as much about the system as those who would use their superior knowledge to have power over your lives.

[jbjd]

Obviously, I disagree.

[jbjd]

Forget about BO. Proving he committed any unlawful act requires at a minimum, proving he is NOT a NBC. (See my extensive comments below to GregNH.)

[LucyT]

. . . . . #39.

I am told, second hand, hearsay, that the certificate signed by VP Cheney, certifying his election by receiving a majority of the vote from the Electoral College, was modified from the form used in prior elections to delete the reference to his eligibility to serve.

I have known for some time about the state certificates for the ballot. Taken together, that is reasonable evidence of knowledge of his ineligibility and of a criminal conspiracy to manipulate the system to install him.

[Thanks, David.]

[jbjd]

Greg, I NEVER link to that tripe. They not only nearly subverted the mission of the work that originates on my blog but they also called me names when I reported they were posting plagiarized material from CFP AND thereby subverting the work. (You can view that nasty quote from John Charlton by doing a search on my blog; after I posted it, he took his tirade against me, off his blog.)

[Spunky]

"I am told, second hand, hearsay,...."

Now David as a lawyer, you know hearsay is not allowed. LOL!

[jbjd]

By the word “evinced” I mean, if Phil Berg had not brought the Hollister case then, BB/BO would not have submitted their responsive Motion to Dismiss containing the footnote requesting judicial notice, memorialized on my blog.

[GregNH]

There is no law in NH but the SoS removed Sal Mohamed from the ballot because his bio claimed he was born in Egypt..

My email exchange with the SOS of NH back in January. Notice she claims that Sal Mohamed was not a NBC but I wonder if she read BHO book would she have disqualified him... No we did not. Candidates sign a declaration of candidacy and we accept that. Mr. Mohamed; however, submitted a biography of himself stating that he was born in Egypt..

—–Original Message—– From: Greg Goss [mailto:Gwg1955@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 9:46 AM To: Elections Subject: Re: Presidential Ballot Rules

So you are telling me that you verified all candidates documentation for eligibility under US Constitution Article II?

—– Original Message —– From: Elections To: Greg Goss Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 9:32 AM Subject: RE: Presidential Ballot Rules

Mr. Mohamed was disqualified because he was born in Egypt; therefore he is not a natural born United States Citizen.

—–Original Message—– From: Greg Goss [mailto:Gwg1955@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 9:22 AM To: Elections Subject: Re: Presidential Ballot Rules

Thank you very much for the reply. I have one question. On your website it list the candidates that filed http://www.sos.nh.gov:80/presprim2008/candidatesfiled.htm. One candidate, “Sal Mohamed” is listed as “Disqualified”. What was the disqualification for? Greg Goss

—– Original Message —– From: Elections To: Greg Goss Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 8:23 AM Subject: RE: Presidential Ballot Rules

I can tell you what the law currently says regarding your questions (subject to change between now and next presidential election).

To be a candidate on the NH PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ballot, a candidate must file a declaration of candidacy and pay a $1,000 filing fee during the filing period which usually occurs in late October or November of the year preceding the presidential primary election.

To be a third party (independent, libertarian, etc) candidate on the NH GENERAL ELECTION ballot as a candidate for president, the candidate must file a declaration of intent during the June filing period and pay a $250. filing fee. THEN, the candidate must obtain 3,000 individual signatures on nomination papers — signed by registered voters in NH — have those signatures certified by the supervisors of the checklist where the voter lives, and then file those papers with the Secretary of State’s Office. There are deadlines for all of the above, but since that next election isn’t until the year 2012, I don’t have the exact dates.

I hope this helps answer your questions.

Karen Ladd

Assistant Secretary of State

—–Original Message—– From: Greg Goss [mailto:Gwg1955@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 5:46 PM To: Elections Subject: Presidential Ballot Rules

This will mark the third attempt at obtaining information concerning the election of federal offices that appear on NH ballots. I have two questions.

1.) What is required for a candidate for President to appear on the NH ballot?

2.) What is the process for meeting or verifying those requirements?

Your attention is required and much appreciated.

Greg Goss

Hudson NH

[GregNH]

There is no law in NH but the SoS removed Sal Mohamed from the ballot because his bio claimed he was born in Egypt..

My email exchange with the SOS of NH back in January. Notice she claims that Sal Mohamed was not a NBC but I wonder if she read BHO's book would she have disqualified him...

No we did not. Candidates sign a declaration of candidacy and we accept that. Mr. Mohamed; however, submitted a biography of himself stating that he was born in Egypt..

—–Original Message—– From: Greg Goss [mailto:Gwg1955@XXX] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 9:46 AM To: Elections Subject: Re: Presidential Ballot Rules

So you are telling me that you verified all candidates documentation for eligibility under US Constitution Article II?

—– Original Message —– From: Elections To: Greg Goss Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 9:32 AM Subject: RE: Presidential Ballot Rules

Mr. Mohamed was disqualified because he was born in Egypt; therefore he is not a natural born United States Citizen.

—–Original Message—– From: Greg Goss [mailto:Gwg1955@XXX] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 9:22 AM To: Elections Subject: Re: Presidential Ballot Rules

Thank you very much for the reply. I have one question. On your website it list the candidates that filed http://www.sos.nh.gov:80/presprim2008/candidatesfiled.htm. One candidate, “Sal Mohamed” is listed as “Disqualified”. What was the disqualification for? Greg Goss

—– Original Message —– From: Elections To: Greg Goss Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 8:23 AM Subject: RE: Presidential Ballot Rules

I can tell you what the law currently says regarding your questions (subject to change between now and next presidential election).

To be a candidate on the NH PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ballot, a candidate must file a declaration of candidacy and pay a $1,000 filing fee during the filing period which usually occurs in late October or November of the year preceding the presidential primary election.

To be a third party (independent, libertarian, etc) candidate on the NH GENERAL ELECTION ballot as a candidate for president, the candidate must file a declaration of intent during the June filing period and pay a $250. filing fee. THEN, the candidate must obtain 3,000 individual signatures on nomination papers — signed by registered voters in NH — have those signatures certified by the supervisors of the checklist where the voter lives, and then file those papers with the Secretary of State’s Office. There are deadlines for all of the above, but since that next election isn’t until the year 2012, I don’t have the exact dates.

I hope this helps answer your questions.

Karen Ladd

Assistant Secretary of State

—–Original Message—– From: Greg Goss [mailto:Gwg1955@XXX] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 5:46 PM To: Elections Subject: Presidential Ballot Rules

This will mark the third attempt at obtaining information concerning the election of federal offices that appear on NH ballots. I have two questions.

1.) What is required for a candidate for President to appear on the NH ballot?

2.) What is the process for meeting or verifying those requirements?

Your attention is required and much appreciated.

Greg Goss

Hudson NH

[AmericanVictory]

Thank you for the clarification. I don’t see any evidence that Berg himself has had much involvement in the case.

[GregNH]

Sorry for the double post. I hit the red x and made changes but Iguess it posted anyway...

[GregNH]

I did know the rift between you a John Carlton. I actually got into a heated discussion defending you at CW’s blog over that. I only posted that link because I was following that story and he had it.

[danamco]

This is nothing new, just go back to LBJ’s shenanigans!!!

[jbjd]

I have addressed this issue on my blog. In brief, just because the law does contains no requirement that the SoS vet the candidates whose names are submitted to that office to appear on the ballot; does not mean, the SoS cannot exercise the discretion written into the law when overseeing the election process, to cull out the names of candidates s/he KNOWS are ineligible for the job.

[jbjd]

You are welcome.

[jbjd]

I wish people would stop focusing on ME and shift their focus to the WORK.

[danamco]

What you see here is the political punting the ball back to the other end of the field, and we have seen this over and over in all the three government and State branches as well. The real question is WHY and WHO are behind the ball???

[danamco]

WHY???

[jbjd]

What is your question? You only wrote, “Why???”

[Seizethecarp]

“I agree about the lack of culpability on the courts.”

I appreciate your research and efforts to explain your findings to lawyers and also to non-lawyers like me.

I am troubled by Judge Robertson’s statement in the Hollister dismissal:

“The issue of the President’s citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America’s vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama’s two-year-campaign for the presidency, but this plaintiff wants it resolved by a court.”

It seems obvious to me that the controversy and possibility of an eligibility crisis rests on a lack of having the legal (not popular) definition of “natural born citizen” resolved by a court.

Judge Robertson could have just denied standing without all of his prejudicial comments directed at Berg and all of us who believe that Obama’s eligibility needs ultimately to be measured against a SCOTUS validated “natural born citizen” standard.