MSNBC: "You made an equivalency between Palin and Obama, do you really want to stand by that?"

Freedom's Lighthouse ^ | October 27, 2009 | Michael

[Federalist Patriot]

Here is video of John McCormack from "The Weekly Standard" on MSNBC debating the media's bias and whether or not Obama is getting a free pass.

David Shuster showed his bias from the start by asking "how about the context in all of this? I mean it's not like President Obama took the nation to war under false pretenses, so maybe to the extent the current president gets a pass there's some context involved."

John McCormack pointed out the media's bias in the coverage of Sarah Palin and Barack Obama's experience during the campaign. Right before the end of the video Shuster asked McCormack "You made an equivalency between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama, do you really want to stand by that?" (Video)

[JPG]

Someday someone will escort Shuster to the back of the bar and punch his lights out.

[bray]

Schyster makes the case better than Politico ever could, even lying about lying about going to war:
http://www.brayincandy.com/id116.html

Pray for America's Freedom

[kabar]

McCormack did a piss poor job of defending himself. Admittedly, it was three against one.

[TurtleUp]

"You made an equivalency between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama, do you really want to stand by that?"

The "equivalency" between the two is only in the sense that they come very close to representing moral absolutes. Sarah Palin is closer to absolute good than we're likely to see in another national politician for a VERY long time, and Obama is her opposite.

[Walrus]

There is no equivalency between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama. Palin is on a MUCH higher plane.