A verbis ad verbera
Posted on 07/02/2009 7:43:35 AM PDT by mudblood
Excellent.
Oops, I do believe I meant the 14th amendment!
White are the victims of hate crimes frequently, at the hands of blacks and “hispanics.”
Holder is a liar and a worthless sack of crap.
Forget him being fired.....he should be in prison.
Despicable ! Racists in the DOJ.
Well, the thing is, other than this site (muffledoar and the links in the article to the testimony), Holder’s testimony has gone almost completely ignored. Its simply stunning. So yes, we should all “bring this up in public”. Hammer Scrotomayor about it and see what her wise-Latino opinion is.
I was going to post, “rape, rob and then rap about it”
GMTA
“Equal protection under the law.”
Since the "natural-born citizen" clause seems to be irrelevant, it would stand to reason the rest of it is, too.
I don’t look forward to it, but, like a trip to the dentist for a bad tooth, it’s gotta be done.
The list, ping
Rule 10. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.”
Rule 13. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
If the Birthers can’t move him out of the White House, he may well be the catalyst for another (un)civil war.
Hey wow, that’s a great site! I’m going to send it around to my own list of folks.
Thanks, glad you like it. I appreciate the support.
... Then I’m sure you’ll appreciate the $20 I just donated. I think we have to support sites like yours in the biggest way. I’m also a monthly subscriber, paid, to PJTV.com.
Keep on keepin’ on!
And another may come to restore it.
I think you are right....SCOUTS OUT!!!
By the way, just posted this to the site...
Washington Post sells access, $25,000+
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/24441.html
“Holder explicitly says the proposed law only protects classes “where there is a history” of violence against those groups. “What we are looking for here in terms of expansion of the statute are instances where there is a historic basis. See, groups of people who are singled out for violence perpetrated against them because of who they are.”
_______________
Okay, fine, Eric. Here’s some HISTORY for you from YOUR justice dept.
http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/2009/04/janeane-garofalo-have-i-got-date-for.html
FACTS!!! They sure do get it the way!
Take a look at the line for white on black crime at the bottom of the following chart.
Also, note the other charts at the link........during republican administrations, black crime
went down and went up under democrats!
White on black crime is nearly zero, but nearly 20% for black on white!
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/race.htmStranger
In 2005, offending rates for blacks were more than 7 times higher than the rates for whites
Homicides are more likely to cross racial lines than those that involve friends or acquaintances
For homicides committed by —
* a friend or acquaintance of the victim, less than one-tenth (8%) were interracial
* a stranger to the victim, one-quarter were interracial
To view data, click on the chart.
Excellent facts that support an excellent point: hate crime is actually more the other way around. Or rather, “violent” crime against a population identifiable by a particular race, in this case ‘white’.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.