Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: divine_moment_of_facts

Yeah, he had me right up until Iraq and Afghanistan, too. And his comments reveal a fundamental misunderstanding of what is going on in each country. If I hear one more idiot talk about “Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction” I will scream. If you are an isolationist who thinks America should not intervene in other counteries’ problems, fine, be one. But to swallow and spew the lies about why we are still in both Iraq and Afghanistan (and will be for a long tme) and what we are trying to accomplish in both countries, is to reveal profound ignorance.


6 posted on 04/19/2009 8:03:44 AM PDT by PackerBoy (Just my opinion ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: PackerBoy

We certainly didn’t try to give the Iraqi people true freedom. We gave them a ‘power sharing’ UN defined parliamentary government, which was expressly designed to install a socialism instead of bringing Iraq into the true free government of individual rights and rule of law.

Why did ‘we’ do that? Why does the American taxpayer and the American soldier have to pay to create more socialism?


11 posted on 04/19/2009 8:27:14 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: PackerBoy
Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction” I will scream.

We didn't find the documented WMD's in the amounts we thought we would because Saddam had time to move, bury or destroy them. And we knew for a fact he intended on obtaining more WMD's in the future! Even Clinton said it!
29 posted on 04/19/2009 4:14:21 PM PDT by divine_moment_of_facts ("Hey Liberals.. We don't lower our standards, so up yours!" - Andrew Wilkow show)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson