Posted on 01/09/2009 3:27:12 PM PST by jetxnet
Many of us already know how much "in the tank" Google is with Obama. Google's CEO first met Obama way back in 2000 and has since had several meetings.
It is also true that Google was caught censoring what they deemed negative content against Obama during the election.
It will also likely be true that Google will eventually censor information for the Obama administration - this is a no-brainer as they have already done so and are tightly coupled.
I am now introducing a new search engine that I personally feel is very good. Some of you may have heard of it already, it's called Gigablast (http://www.gigablast.com).
Google's success hinges on traffic and sponsored search ads (they charge 4-5$ per click). If Google's traffic was reduced even by 15-20% consistantly - it would be huge losses in profit for Google.
Do you want to stick it to George Soros and Google's CEO? Tell everyone you know to start using Gigablast.com.
If you are conservative and know Google's history, the choice is already made to use something different.
I will try it. I hate Google - evil empire.
I searched for "Gigablast" on Cuil and got 20 million hits.
Try search for pictures of Michelle in that laughable red and black dress from the convention. You won’t find them using google. There is a lot of obama washing on google.
Not Microsoft?
I just tried Cuil and like that one too .. it seems they have a more article-like format. Good for searching deep content, but for quick searches revealing just the links and short descriptions - Gigablast.
Microsoft is heavy in the take for Obama too. Yahoo is as well.
GE is major Liberal and owns MSNBC.
Ping for SA...
I think the poster was referring to the “Black Widow” dress.
Google does not charge $4 to $5 per click. I advertise on Adwords, and it is a tiered system. It costs me, on average, less than $300 per month depending on the number of clicks I receive, based on how I decide to tier my ads. If I want more traffic, I must pay more. At the tier I applied for, the average click rate is $.02-$.05 per click.
When we, as conservatives, distort the facts, its harms us, as we always receive the bad media attention for the slightest of errors. There is no reason to post such an urban legend-sounding piece that has obviously not been fact checked.
Yes, Google may me a liberal mouthpiece, but I don’t have a problem with them. Capitalism is Capitalism, and its good for everyone. God bless the almighty dollar and Google’s stock.
I just looked at both. I'll be checking them out and recommending to friends if they are as claimed out here.
Thanks for this thread.
Needs to have a Firefox addon....
Yeah, and if you looks at all the “New Party” websites that have Obama’s address tied to it ... they all have a Black and Red theme to the site.
Someone could probably make the add-on.
Firefox is hugely Liberal too! Netscape is very liberal.
Try Opera - that browser is very fast, secure and has very good navigation features.
Crickeys! That is exactly a black widow symbol.
Jeepers, that’s scary. For three reasons:
1) Who were the image people who scr*wed that one up? That’s really bad staffing.
2) Michelle has enough of an image problem that matching her up with a Black Widow deadly spider image is too reinforcing of her bad reputation as a really mean person.
3)”Black Widow” is not what you want people to think about a President’s wife. Not that I would want any harm to befall the President. I dislike his politics tremendously, but nobody should be presenting images that imply assassination.
Yikes!
So that's what happened!
I did searches on CUIL and it seemed to bring up UK sites. Is CUIL British?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.