http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=2299
POLARIK says:
December 30, 2008 at 5:24 pm
Jean:
I discussed the reason for the blackout of the Certificate Number back in June on my blog, The Greater Evil (polarik.blogtownhall.com). It is also in my final report, Obama’s born Conspiracy, which I encourage you to read.
The Certificate Number is comprised of the Form type (151 is used for both the Certificate of Live Birth and Certification of Live Birth), the year of birth (which is 1961, or alleged to be), and lastly a CHRONOLOGICAL & SEQUENTIAL INDEX which is reset every subsequent birth year and increments each time a birth registration is processed from January 1 until December 31 for that birth year.
HOWEVER, Hawaii accepted LATE BIRTH REGISTRATIONS meaning that any birth registration requested after December 31 of the birth year would receive whatever was the NEXT AVAILABLE CERTIFICATE NUMBER, and definitely would not be a number less than the number of births recorded for that year.
Now, IMHO, the reason why it was redacted on the alleged “scan” image, but allegedly shown as 010641 in the phony Factcheck photos, is that Obama’s birth registration was, in fact, a late one, and would not have a number less than 14,000 (approx. the number of births for 1961 that actually were recorded during 1961). I believe that if you looked up birth record #151 1961-10641, you would find someone who is now deceased!
Seeing as how none has ever seen any evidence of Obama’s real birth record, why not just borrow the certificate number from someone you know who really was born in Hawaii in 1961, or even from someone deceased who won’t have much use for it anymore. I’m sure that Obama could have picked one up on his trip to Hawaii prior to August 21 — the date that Factcheck posted their phony photos.
As i have maintained throughout my four months of research, from June to September, there was never a real, paper Certification of Live Birth made from Obama’s birth record.
And, I can tell you that Maya’s COLB was not used for the forgery. That was the categorically, false theory of the now, discredited Techdude, whom I exposed as a fraud a full month before his “Exclusive Forgery Report” was published on July 20 of this year.
It also cannot be Maya’s COLB because the year of birth would be wrong and the number would point to someone living who could identify it.
There were approximately 14,000 births in 1961, and #10,641 is bit low for someone allegedly born on August 4th as far fewer babies are born in the last quarter of the year than the second and third quarters.
Jean, the ultimate source for all things related to Obama’s COLB (and everyone else’s COLB) is my 160-page (printed), fully illustrated report at polarik.blogtownhall.com
FYI, Not only was I the very first person to identify and demonstrate that the online COLB is a forgery, I was the only one to prove that Factcheck’s photos are also fraudulent forgeries.
The coup de grace, as far as Obama’s COLB being bogus with a capital “B”, is the fact that the Seal pictured on Obama’s COLB, allegedly printed in 2007, is not the Seal that appears on real 2007 COLBs (BTW, it was the borders found on real 2007 COLBs that sunk TechDude’s dingy).
The cold, hard facts in this case seem not dissuade the Obamatons who insist that the online COLB is proof of his US citizenship, his natural-born status, and everything else connected with the Obama legend. The facts have also not deterred my detractors who were (and maybe still are) desperate to prove me wrong. Yet, their best (and last) great hope was someone (with “impeccable credentials”) who claimed to have “debunked” my final report — which would have been an incredible feat, seeing as how he never read it. Techdude also had “impeccable credentials” — except that he stole them from someone else.
As far as forensic document experts go, Sandra Lines is the real deal, folks, and they don’t come any better. When it comes to the field of COLB research, I’m all alone here, and that is why I am thankful to Sandra for giving her stamp of approval to my work.
The bottom line is that, regardless of who this all plays out, a deliberate, premeditated act of fraud was committed bwhen this false identification document was created and passed off as “Obama’s original birth certificate” (and still is, according to Obama’s own website), for the sole purpose of deceiving the American public into believing that Obama is a natural-born US citizen and, therefore, is Constitutionally qualified to serve as President.
There were many people who were complicit in planning and committing this act of fraud — and what better way to shield oneself from scrutiny than to call this fraud a “right-wing conspiracy voiced by a few sore loser, nut-jobs wearing tin-foil hats?”
Now, I cannot say that any formal changes will ever come from this online COLB conspiracy — yes, it is a bonafide conspiracy. It may be swept under the rug and forgotten, and the ones behind this little charade may never be known. Yet, I don’t hear as many people pointing fingers and laughing now as compared to the number I heard back in June when I began this research.
In fact, I now see hundreds of thousands of new fingers being wagged in the direction of Obama, and it means that I helped to enlighten others.
BTW, I learned that there were 17,716 births in 1961, not 14,000 -- I was looking at the number for Honolulu.
If births were evenly spread across quarters, then #10640 would not be that far off..but I cannot find a periodic breakdown for Hawaii in 1961.