You’re not fighting for the constitution when you are spreading this conspiracy theory. You are engaing in wishful thinking.
***And you are engaging in outright cowardice.
I wish Obama wasn’t going to be president, too, but the reality is that he will be taking the oath on January 20.
***It’s highly likely that you are correct but you do not know that because you do not know the future. It’s an argument from silence, a classic fallacy, in this case the silence is the future. So get lost, troll, take a critical thinking class and quit sniping at genuine conservatives who are fighting for this constitutional republic rather than slithering into the cowardice cave like you.
We can either use what little sway we have in Washington to block Obama’s radical agenda
***How has that worked so far? You work your side of the street, we’ll work ours.
(thank God we’ve kept the Dems from getting 60 senators, but it’s still going to be tough to keep every Republican in line on a lot of stuff), or we can get distracted by useless conspiracy theories.
***Go ahead, prove this is a useless conspiracy theory. How many other useless conspiracy theories have been forwarded 4 times for conference by SCOTUS? Huh? I can’t hear you! That’s a big fat ZERO. You know it, too, so it’s time for you to STFU.
That’s why there are so many of these newbies (including Polarik). They want to keep us distracted because FR has proven effective in the past.
***You callin’ me a newbie? I’ve been here almost twice as long as you, troll. This thread has PROOF that Polarik’s evidence is scientifically noteworthy, as FILED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. So that’s the standard, troll. If you want to criticize someone with that level of expertise then you need to have an affidavit filed in a lawsuit where someone else puts their credentials on the line for what you’re saying. You won’t because you can’t. Polarik already has. So why don’t you just sit back, STFU, and learn something while you sign up for that critical thinking class you need so much?
I admit that unlike some of you, I haven’t obsessed over this non-story for months, but just how many times has any court ruled in favor of anyone bringing these suits? That would also be a big fat ZERO. These cases have been seen as, to quote US District Judge R. Barclay Surrick “frivolous and not worthy of discussion”. Ouch. And yet, you think some court is going to overlook all of the evidence, just because of something Barack’s granny said.