Affidavit Supporting Polarik's Evidence in Keyes vs. Lingle

Keyes vs. Lingle ^ | 12/4/2008 | Sandra Ramsey Lines

[MHGinTN]

Got another addy to follow:

http:192.234,213,35/clerkarchive/DailyJournal/1981/Volumes/

Going to check it out now.

[bvw]

I mark us as being around January 1933 right now. 75 years!

[MHGinTN]

Make that ...

http://192.234,213,35/clerkarchive/DailyJournal/1981/Volumes/

[little jeremiah]

Unfortunately Lurking Libertarian says that there is no chance the SCOTUS will hear this because none of the lawyers arguing these cases are bigshot names. Sickening, if true.

If the SCOTUS refuses to hear any of these cases, and this is the reason why, then we’re over as a nation.

[MHGinTN]

One more time, with periods!

http://192.234.213.35/clerkarchive/DailyJournal/1981/Volumes/

[MHGinTN]

For those more adept at this stuff, here's the working link. I've messed the addy up somehow but the following takes you tot he archives:

http://192.234.213.35/clerkarchive/

[conservativegramma]

http://192.234.213.35/clerkarchive/

The link works, but all I’m getting is a table of contents and a large download file.

Time to call it a night, I’ll try again tomorrow. Thanks.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[MHGinTN]

I got a little deeper, but suddenly was bumped and given a 'cannot display file' message. Here's the trail I was on when I got bumped:

http://192.234.213/clerk archive/Daily Journal/1981/volumes/812_shr.PDF

[Red Steel]

Unfortunately Lurking Libertarian says that there is no chance the SCOTUS will hear this because none of the lawyers arguing these cases are bigshot names. Sickening, if true.

And I told him that's crazy. To only accept cases on who would argue the cases and not accept it based on their merits.

Stupid.

[jetxnet]

192.234.213 is not even a valid IP address.

The last three numbers of this IP address are missing.

[MHGinTN]

I hate it when this happens in the middle of reading a page I've finally brought up! ...

Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage

Most likely causes:
You are not connected to the Internet.
The website is encountering problems.
There might be a typing error in the address.

[MHGinTN]

Actually it was last two digits:

http://192.234.213.35/clerk archive/Daily Journal/1981/volumes/812_shr.PDF

[little jeremiah]

If it’s true, then our country is burnt toast.

[MHGinTN]

http://192.234.213.35/clerkarchive/archive/FinalHistory/1981/1981toc.pdf See how deeply you get when you go to that link. Obammy's scrubbers are , really quick and really watching the net!

[jetxnet]

I get good penetration going here:

http://192.234.213.35/clerkarchive/archive/FinalHistory/1981/

They really should turn off directory browsing.

[Red Steel]

I’ve heard before that certain law firms argue cases in front of the Supreme Court, but I did not know that SCOTUS justices exclusively accepts them only as their court jesters.

It’s surely not written in stone. It’s probably an informal and unwritten rule because of SCOTUS’s familiarity of local law firms. It’s certainly not a good practice. And I doubt SCOTUS would drop cases just for a particularly group of lawyers they are comfortable with because they are not presenting the arguments, especially the cases that could profoundly effect the nation.

[Polarik]

I’ll ask him about it.

[Polarik]

Pls PM it to me. Thx

[MHGinTN]

I was able to find the 1981 table of contents for the sessions but cannot find a particular appropriation for foreign students or Aid to Indonesian/foreign students, and I cannot find the actual Journal scripts, just tables of contents and final bill names and numbers.