I'd consider you a friendly & sincere propagandist for a Big Lie. Unlike YHAOS, you limit your insults to an acceptable bantering, which I appreciate.
So you are the "good cop," to the YHAOS "bad cop," trying to work me over here.
And I'm obviously making no impression on either one of you, so we've probably long ago passed the point of any useful discussion.
Bottom line: you want us to belive that science itself is a Big Lie. I think that's unlikely, but that it's CERTAIN you are attacking science out of your own religious convictions. And I share the view that God created the Universe for His own purposes, but I also think He made the varios physical processes comprehensible by mankind.
****I’d consider you a friendly & sincere propagandist for a Big Lie.****
The feeling is mutual...I think the exact same thing about you.
****Bottom line: you want us to belive that science itself is a Big Lie.****
I don’t think science is a big lie....I think they’ve created a construct that won’t allow them to seek the truth.
They view things forensically through the lens of evolution and only through the lens of evolution. When you do that you are not seeking truth....you are trying to validate your worldview. It goes something like this:
“The answer is evolution, now what’s the question?”
They like to say they’re going wherever the evidence leads but since they built a mechanism that only allows natural explanations that’s all they are ever going to find and often times they have to twist and turn the evidence to make it fit.
****And I share the view that God created the Universe for His own purposes, but I also think He made the varios physical processes comprehensible by mankind.****
Me too.