To: roamer_1
I find it curious that the posters here are knocking only Fred for the no-show - the others aren’t named....rather selective
147 posted on
09/17/2007 6:13:08 PM PDT by
maine-iac7
(",,,but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." LINCOLN)
To: maine-iac7
I find it curious that the posters here are knocking only Fred for the no-show - the others aren’t named....rather selective
The others were never even considerations. Threads like this one do a good job of letting conservatives see why Fred isn't a consideration either. Oh, he may collected enough money and corporate endorsements to make a run at the nomination. He'll proceed to lose a general election in grand style. Don't think that all these glaring faults (cancer, amnesty, etc) won't be exploited to the hilt by an array of enemy 527s.
148 posted on
09/17/2007 6:31:34 PM PDT by
Old_Mil
(Rudy = Hillary, Fred = Dole, Romney = Kerry, McCain = Crazy. No Thanks.)
To: maine-iac7
I find it curious that the posters here are knocking only Fred for the no-show - the others aren’t named....rather selectiveI was referring to your comments @ #137. Fred was the subject thereof.
149 posted on
09/17/2007 6:58:33 PM PDT by
roamer_1
(Vote for FrudyMcRomson -Turn red states purple in 08!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson