Your response is notably w/o substance and you were given a complete and understandable blueprint of the law and how the law applies to rights.
Re: "LOL! It's near 100% effective.
" Try nearly 0% 100% effective would mean that there are no armed criminals. Somehow that hasn't happened."
Ridiculous! You're simply ignoring the fact that the IBC applies to the legal market only.
Re: Wrong. Congress forbid keeping the records
"Ohh then OF COURSE the feebs aren't keeping them.
If they are, it's illegal. If they are, it only matters to those that know they will inevitably never defend their rights. The rest don't give a damn what they do, because ultimately if they use them, the rest will be up to the challenge.
Try nearly 0% --
100% effective would mean that there are no armed criminals. Somehow that hasn't happened.
Spunkets cries "Ridiculous!":
You're simply ignoring the fact that the IBC applies to the legal market only.
Amusing wordgaming, seeing that the rational objection to the "instant check' is that it infringes on the rights of only "legal" buyers.
You lawyerly types are so caught up in your own bizarrely 'clever' applications of language, -- that you no longer understand common english law or logic.