[Mr. Silverback]

Oh, I mention to you what I believe are the inevitable results of "pro-life doesn't necessarily mean pro-life" approach and that's political bullying? No, that's called "debate." Man up a little. And don't tell me what conservatives are tired of, i am a conservative, and you're a fool if you think someone is insufficiently conservative because they don't think your tactics will get the job done.

But, if you must run away from this conversation, like you did yesterday, go for it. I don't care.

I'm sorry, could you tell me when you got put in charge of my schedule, Chester? It's not my job to respond to your posts when you feel like I should. I didn't run away from anything. If I hadn't responded to you we wouldn't be ahving this conversation right now, would we?

That said, my schedule doesn't include time to argue with rude whiners, so get back to me if you feel like apologizing for your behavior and having a real conversation about how to get a pro-lifer elected President. That's what I'm going for; I'm not sure what you're aiming for.

[EternalVigilance]

having a real conversation about how to get a pro-lifer elected President.

Yeah, why don't we do that? The Fred Thompson "let the states do what they want" approach will let at least 80 to 90% of the babies continue to be butchered that would under Roe. How pro-life is that? Not very, if you're a baby in one of those states...the states, by the way, where most of the abortions take place now.