[LenS]

Since Iran wishes to exterminate Israel and exterminate or enslave us, I have no problem with using devices that make Hiroshima look like a firecracker. In fact, that's better since it will kill millions of Iranian and not a hundred thousand or so. This is a war to the knife. The survivor is the winner.

[EndWelfareToday]

I'm tellin all ya all. It's better if Mecca were nuked first. I really don't think Israel plans on using "nukes" of any kind to destroy Iran's nuclear program. Bunker busters yes. Nukes? NO!

Remember when the US first used our largest bunker buster? Remember the reports by Al Qaeda that we'd dropped limited thermal nuclear devices in Afghanistan? The propaganda wing of Al Qaeda supported by their friends in the media are only setting up the eventual false allegations in order to turn world opinion against Israel. What everyone (Including Israel) seems to forget however is that God (Elohim not allah) is on the side of Israel. ;)

[ExSoldier]

I have no problem with using devices that make Hiroshima look like a firecracker. In fact, that's better since it will kill millions of Iranian and not a hundred thousand or so. This is a war to the knife. The survivor is the winner.

Really? You'd have no problem with that level of nuclear ordinance being used so close to a couple hundred thousand US troops right next door in Iraq? You'd just write them off to radiation poisoning or total electronic paralysis from the EMP? That would fry the ignitions of the Humvees, tanks, trucks, fuel pumps, everything. Possibly even the greatest US advantage (night vision equipment) might be neutralized. Still think it's a great idea? There is no way that use of nuclear weapons in any size bigger than Hiroshima/Nagasaki leaves anybody on the planet untouched.