The CBS "news" blog thinks something is fishy in Truthoutthewindow land:
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2006/05/15/publiceye/entry1618732.shtml
The fact nobody in the MSM has been able to verify it suggests the story is not accurate in some respects.
This is a curious story in so many ways. If it is true, why would Rove’s spokesperson issue such a strong denial? It would appear pretty silly to deny one day what is going to happen the next.
Did Patrick Fitzgerald come to Patton Boggs for 15 hours Friday? No. Did he come to Patton Boggs for any period of time Friday? No. Did he meet anywhere else with Karl Rove's representatives? No. Did he communicate in any way with Karl Rove's representatives? No. Did he inform Rove or Rove's representatives that Rove had been indicted? No.
New DUmp thread, about a Pitt truthout post from today:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1196234
It seems the new phrase Pitt is using is that Rove has "reportedly" been indicted. LOL.
Gee, do they really think so?
I love how they give passing reference to Leopold's credibility issues, but then treat him as if that doesn't matter. It's business as usual in 'Leftyland'.
Has Karl Rove been indicted? That was the big rumor sweeping the Web over the weekend, courtesy of a report on the liberal Web site Truthout.org. On Saturday, Jason Leopold reported on the site that President Bush’s political architect had been informed of a pending indictment. . . . The basis for these reports? “Sources,” of course. . . . The fact nobody in the MSM has been able to verify it suggests the story is not accurate in some respects.
"http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2006/05/15/publiceye/entry1618732.shtml"
Hey, PJ - I saw your response to this thread, advertising your blog!