Pirro will support Bush's national security and war-on-terror agendas, she will support his judicial nominations, which is where the real leverage is on the abortion issue--NB pro-lifers!, she will support his fiscal policies. So there is every difference in the world between Pirro and clinton.
And this doesn't begin to discuss the clintons' corruption, betrayal and ineptitude. Or the rapes and other predation.
Let us not forget: hillary clinton hired Jamie Gorelick--think 'Mohammed Atta'.
see 'HILLARY'S TRIPLE PLAY: the clinton putsch + filegate + the gorelick wall'
Pirro is an acclaimed crime-fighter and advocate for the vulnerable.
The contrast could not be more stark.
Thank you for recognizing the importance of the nota bene (a little Latin lingo there - to call attention to something important) pro-lifers. :^)
I think the choice between two anti-life gun-grabbing pro-gay marriage liberal women with criminal husbands is unacceptable. Conservatives should not support either candidate on principle.