Posted on 08/11/2005 2:24:47 PM PDT by GunnyBob
It would appear I am a psychic, which is not to be confused with a psycho. I am really starting to freak out.
On April 19, 2004, I published a column on Men's News Daily saying the 9-11 Commission would fail for a multitude of reasons, one of which was a blatant conflict of interest regarding commission member and rabid Clintonista Jamie Gorelick. I wrote: “Back in the 1990s, Jamie Gorelick was a bureaucrat who was instrumental in preventing the Central Intelligence Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation from sharing crucial intelligence on terrorist activity. Now she is investigating herself, which is a clear conflict of interest, but she refuses to resign.”
It was revealed this week by Congressman Curt Weldon that the 9-11 commission was twice given intelligence on a top-secret Department of Defense intelligence unit in 2000 called Able Danger that identified Mohammed Atta and three of his cell members as al Qaeda terrorists likely planning attacks in America. Commission co-chair and former Democratic Congressman Lee Hamilton, another Clintonista, first adamantly denied his commission received that intelligence and demanded to know why the Pentagon was hiding it from the commission. Now he and Gorelick are scrambling for cover as calls grow for a major investigation of the 9-11 Commission to determine if Gorelick and Hamilton intentionally hid the intelligence that showed the Clinton Administration knew an al Qaeda cell was in the USA and refused to do a damn thing about it, resulting in the worst terror attack in the history of mankind. Yes, the commission had the intelligence that would have shown the Clinton Administration’s negligence allowed the 9-11 attacks and it appears now that some Democrats on the commission may have kept the intelligence from the Republican commission members. Do you think Jamie Gorelick and the Clintons suppressed the intelligence?
The Clinton Administration always denied knowing anything about al Qaeda being here. Now two Clinton supporters from the 9-11 Commission have been implicated in a scandal that could range from dereliction of duty and professional negligence to a conspiracy to suppress evidence in order to protect their pal and former president Bill Clinton, who was apparently too busy having sex with an intern in an Oval Office broom closet than to protect America.
Do we want an investigation into the failings of the 9-11 Commission? Do we want the investigation to try to determine if Clinton himself knew of the al Qaeda cell? After all, as the saying goes from the Watergate scandal, what did the president know and when did he know it? I want a special prosecutor appointed to fully investigate the 9-11 Commission to get to the bottom of this deadly scandal. I said in my column in April 2004 that Jamie Gorelick was a snake in the grass. She was instrumental in preventing the FBI and CIA from sharing intelligence and now she has been implicated in a possible coverup that could reveal her role in the 9-11 attacks being made possible.
Do we want President Clinton to be deposed by a special prosecutor? If he says he knew nothing about the intelligence, would you believe him? Do we suspect Hillary was involved in this coverup? If Hamilton or Gorelick deny all this, would you believe them? If they are investigated, charged and found guilty of conspiracy to suppress evidence, what punishment would seem fair to you?
Do we want another 9-11 commission, this one totally non-partisan, to be created so the truth about 9-11 can finally be revealed? Or should we just let bygones be bygones?
This is not Breaking News; it belongs in Bloggers and Personal as a Vanity.
Read this already somewhere...where could that be? Oh yeah, here 3 days ago.
By the by, if you haven't heard the Gunny's radio program you are truly missing out.
Nothing psychic about it. Freepers were all over this on the live 9/11 Commission thread about Gorelick both before and after Ashcroft's bombshell testimony.
And -- What did Sandy Berger steal and why did he steal it?
I say let's go after the lying, cheating, philandering, worthless, good-for-nothing so-and-so.
Where do I send my contribution?
> Do we want an investigation into the failings of
> the 9-11 Commission?
We need to know who suppressed this, and what ELSE
they suppressed.
Weldon is calling for an investigation into a major scandalous coverup involving the Clintons and 3,000 dead Americans.
Every news channel is reporting it.
That's not breaking news? The news channels say it is.
Maggot!
The New DemocRAT MOPE Party = Media Obstructionist Partisan Elites Party
Death , Dishonor, Destruction
Clintoon's 3D Legacy?
GORELICK GATE: Developing... Thx Backhoe!
FR Archives Search Results for Gorelick Wall
Yahoo Search Results for Gorelick Wall
No, it's not Breaking News.
Don't believe me? Look where the mods moved it.
I guess all the news channels are wrong.
Sorry.
Obviously, the mods know better.
Can you not differentiate between a news story and what YOU think?
You're thoughts aren't Breaking News.
The American people have a right to know what role the person, and party, they elected to office prior to 9/11, played in the intelligence failures that led to 9/11.
As I recall president Bush was delayed in taking office because of dem obstructions i.e. the election protests into Dec. of 2000, they wouldn't give the Bush team the keys to offices, they held hearing after hearing of his nominees, and they completely trashed the White House- these are not the actions of people taking threats to national security, and the American people, seriously-Able Danger.
That's the problem with the democrat party in a nutshell. Bill was getting BJ's from Monica in the White House, and scheming for his personal glory/gain- corruption after corruption- when he should have taken the duties of his Office seriously.
It's my hope and prayer that NEVER AGAIN, will our citizens claim that "character doesn't matter" when electing a presidential candidate.
The American people have a right to know what role the person, and party, they elected to office prior to 9/11, played in the intelligence failures that led to 9/11.
As I recall president Bush was delayed in taking office because of dem obstructions i.e. the election protests into Dec. of 2000, they wouldn't give the Bush team the keys to offices, they held hearing after hearing of his nominees, and they completely trashed the White House- these are not the actions of people taking threats to national security, and the American people, seriously-Able Danger.
That's the problem with the democrat party in a nutshell. Bill was getting BJ's from Monica in the White House, and scheming for his personal glory/gain- corruption after corruption- when he should have taken the duties of his Office seriously.
It's my hope and prayer that NEVER AGAIN, will our citizens claim that "character doesn't matter" when electing a presidential candidate.
Why are you all a-twitter about so trivial a matter?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.